Re: To cull or not to cull? Mozart / Böhm

Liste des GroupesRevenir à rmc recordings 
Sujet : Re: To cull or not to cull? Mozart / Böhm
De : paoloapesenti (at) *nospam* gmail.com (PPeso)
Groupes : rec.music.classical.recordings
Date : 30. Aug 2024, 22:43:09
Autres entêtes
Organisation : To protect and to server
Message-ID : <vatedd$3naok$1@paganini.bofh.team>
References : 1 2
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On Aug 29, 2024 at 7:17:34 AM EDT, "Roland van Gaalen"
<vangaalenusenet@gmail.com> wrote:
 
YES, I'm going to cull:

- Mozart / Symphonies 35-41 / Berlin Philh / Karl Böhm / 1962, 1966
Reason: rather dull on the whole, not elegant
DG 447 416-2 (2 CDs)
>
In my case, culling a CD means: moving it from the CD cabinet in the
living room to the shoeboxes in the attic.
So, if Böhm goes to the attic what stays in the cabinet? Furtwangler 1940s? Toscanini 1950? Walter 1959 (more elegant than Böhm)? Bernstein 1984 (more big band-ish than Böhm)? Hogwood (abrasive strings and all?) Harnoncourt (HIP)? Abbado 2008 (HIP-ish)? Peltokoski 2023 (post-Harnoncourt-ish)?
Just curious...

Date Sujet#  Auteur
29 Aug 24 * To cull or not to cull? Mozart / Böhm9Roland van Gaalen
29 Aug 24 +- Re: To cull or not to cull? Mozart / Böhm1mINE109
29 Aug 24 +* Re: To cull or not to cull? Mozart / Böhm3Pluted Pup
30 Aug 24 i`* Re: To cull or not to cull? Mozart / Böhm2Roland van Gaalen
31 Aug 24 i `- Re: To cull or not to cull? Mozart / Böhm1Pluted Pup
30 Aug 24 `* Re: To cull or not to cull? Mozart / Böhm (was: To cull or not to cull? Mozart / Böhm)4Owen Hartnett
30 Aug 24  `* Re: To cull or not to cull? Mozart / Böhm3PPeso
31 Aug 24   `* Re: To cull or not to cull? Mozart / Böhm2Roland van Gaalen
2 Sep 24    `- Re: To cull or not to cull? Mozart / Böhm (was: To cull or not to cull? Mozart / Böhm)1Owen Hartnett

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal