Sujet : Re: To cull or not to cull? Mozart / Böhm (was: To cull or not to cull? Mozart / Böhm)
De : ads (at) *nospam* clipboardinc.com (Owen Hartnett)
Groupes : rec.music.classical.recordingsDate : 02. Sep 2024, 17:59:52
Autres entêtes
Message-ID : <ztqdnYMDa7iVckj7nZ2dnZfqnPqdnZ2d@supernews.com>
References : 1 2 3 4
User-Agent : Usenapp for MacOS
On Aug 31, 2024 at 6:20:31 AM EDT, "Roland van Gaalen"
<
vangaalenusenet@gmail.com> wrote:
PPeso wrote:
<< So, if Böhm goes to the attic what stays in the cabinet? Furtwangler>
1940s? Toscanini 1950? Walter 1959 (more elegant than Böhm)? Bernstein
1984 (more big band-ish than Böhm)? Hogwood (abrasive strings and all?)
Harnoncourt (HIP)? Abbado 2008 (HIP-ish)? Peltokoski 2023
(post-Harnoncourt-ish)? >>
What stays in the CD cabinet, and in the holy of holies inside it, will
be decided in due course, on the basis of separate, fair reviews of all
individual CDs concerned.
A veritable Ark of the Cabinet!
-Owen
To cull or not to cull? Mozart / Böhm
Re: To cull or not to cull? Mozart / Böhm
