Sujet : Re: Best Burleske
De : dan.koren (at) *nospam* gmail.com (DeepBlue)
Groupes : rec.music.classical.recordingsDate : 18. Dec 2024, 19:18:45
Autres entêtes
Organisation : novaBBS
Message-ID : <1270c36167c7c3f2aaaf975667867d22@www.novabbs.com>
References : 1 2 3 4
User-Agent : Rocksolid Light
On Wed, 18 Dec 2024 7:35:12 +0000, Zionazi wrote:
So it appears, Gould‘s Burleske
is rather not well-liked.
And for good reason. Can you spell
L-E-A-D-E-N ?!? He plays it like a
dirge, not like a "Burleske".
Let me see ifI can hear this…
No you can't. You would have
heard it already if you could.
the Problem with Argerich imo is,
she Rushes too much,
How would you know? You don't
know the score, you don't play
the piano, and you have absolutely
no understanding of piano performance.
Similar to freire… and they‘re
both not really mischeavous in
contrast to Gould - who is also
really raw and dark…
And what makes you think the work
is "raw and dark" ?!?
Not to mention "raw and dark" is
is inconsistent with mischievous
(note the spelling).
BTW did you notice how slow Gould
plays it?
Can you spell B-U-T-C-H-E-R?
Time to remove the concrete from
your ears and flush all the shit
between them.
Ciao!