Liste des Groupes | Revenir à rmc recordings |
On 4/6/2025 6:36 PM, DeepBlue wrote:It seems to me you are stretching the meaning of the
>How is this not "strict literalism", and how did he>
know "better"? Today's instruments are nothing like
the pianoforti and the fortepiani of his time. Could
any compawsers living in those times have imagined
the sound of a 9' Boisendorfer, Fazioli, or Yamaha?
Precisely my point, they couldn't. This is why Schubert
and co. played on a Fazioli is a transcription. Nothing
wrong with that, and not a very original point anyway
after about sixty years of debates on original
instruments and HIPs.
Thanks for allowing me minimal constitutional rights! ;-)I very much prefer to hear different sound, different>
color palettes, and different expression and phrasing
from the two pianists rather than a homogenuous sound
mix. To my ears the latter is more bland.
Your prerogative.
"We" are not reinventing "wheels" or anything else. YouA performance>
of a 4 hand piano work on 2 pianos is not a transcription
unless the score has been modified. If one followed your
reasoning to its logical conclusion performing the work
on any instrumenti that are however different from Franz'
spinet would create a "transcription".
Technically Schubert played pianos by Seidner and Walther
& Sohn. And, actually, a modification of the "score" has
never been a necessary condition for a "transcription"
(in fact, a modification of the score is more properly
an "arrangement"). Again, we are reinventing the wheel
here. And again, whatever makes you happy.
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.