Re: "F-You": Megyn Kelly Blasts Taylor Swift Endorsement Of Kamala

On Sep 18, 2024 at 9:49:29 AM PDT, "shawn" <nanoflower@notforg.m.a.i.l.com>
wrote:

On Wed, 18 Sep 2024 16:11:35 -0000 (UTC), BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com>
wrote:
 

On Sep 18, 2024 at 8:41:07 AM PDT, "shawn" <nanoflower@notforg.m.a.i.l.com>
wrote:
 

 On Wed, 18 Sep 2024 13:55:15 -0000 (UTC), BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com>
 wrote:
 

 On Sep 17, 2024 at 11:07:36 PM PDT, "super70s" <super70s@super70s.invalid>
 wrote:
 

  On 2024-09-18 04:46:16 +0000, BTR1701 said:
 

   In article <vcdjin$3u40g$1@dont-email.me>,
    Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> wrote:
  

   On 9/14/24 1:38 PM, BTR1701 wrote:

   In article <vc4de8$1hv0l$7@dont-email.me>,
   Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> wrote:

  
   Megyn Kelly blasted Taylor Swift after the pop star came out and endorsed
   Vice President Kamala Harris for president following the ABC Presidential
   Debate.

  
   Before anyone lets Swift influence their vote, they ought to stop and
   consider that 90% of her songs are about how she always chooses the
   wrong person.

  
   But those songs are about her appalling taste in boyfriends (except the
   pot-shot at Katy Perry) and I doubt she wants Harris as her "boyfriend"
   ... although, it would be a much better choice than any of her previous
   or curerent braindead morons.

  
   Taylor Swift is a billionaire.

 
  So is Trump. At least that's what he claims. Who knows what he may owe
  Russian oligarchs that doesn't show up on his financial statements.
 

   She's not at the grocery store having to
   decide whether to feed her family or pay her mortgage.

 
  Neither is Trump.
 

   She's not at the gas pump deciding if she can fill her tank up or just
   settle for half because gas prices are so high.

 
  Neither is Trump.

 
 Trump isn't the one saying the economy is super-duper thanks to Democrats.
 

   While she's flying her private jets around the world, you're struggling
   to gas up your car just so you can get to work.

 
  Really? Gas is around $2.70/gal. around here.

 
 $5.12 in deep blue California, down from a high of over $7.00/gallon in the
 last year, in a state run by Democrats from top to bottom.

 
 That's going to remain the same even if Trump wins the Presidency as
 you well know. Since the reason for your high gas prices is due to
 California politics. Price in gas has been coming down. I just noticed
 even the premium has dropped below $3/gallon here in the Atlanta area.
 

   (That's when you're not worrying how long it'll be before the
 'progressives'
   in your state legislature sacrifice your car altogether to appease their
  Climate Cult.)

 
  Pure scare tactics, we know how desperate the right is these days.

 
 Might want to look into Gavvy Newsom's ban on gas-powered vehicles by 2030,
 genius. And as the California car market goes, traditionally so goes the
rest
 of the nation.

 
 It won't happen as too many states in the USA will never go for that.

 
They will if the federal government follows California's lead. Kammie is a
graduate of the same San Francisco school of politics that produced Jerry
Brown, Gavin Newsom, Chesa Boudin, and Nancy Pelosi. What makes you think she
won't take their baton and run with it?

 
Even if she wanted to she can't due to the need to get Congress and
the other states to go along.

If she can squeak it through Congress, the other states will be irrelevant due
to the abuse of the Commerce Clause we've endured for the last 90 years or
so.

 Especially given how electric vehicles behave when it turns really
 cold. Not something you want when even your nearest neighbor may be
 miles away.

 
Not a concern for Gavvy. We have plenty of places that get snow and freezing
temps in California but the Climate Cult doesn't care. The ultimate goal is
to
end private car ownership altogether, of course.
 
The powers that be know this whole EV thing is unworkable, both from an
environmental and practical perspective. They're just using them as a way of
accomplishing the first part of the plan: getting rid of all the gas-powered
vehicles.
 
After that's accomplished, they'll suddenly 'discover' that the EV is just as
bad for mother Gaia as those old dirty gas cars were, just in different ways,
so those will also need to be restricted, with the ultimate goal of ending
personal vehicle ownership altogether. Because nothing has given people more
freedom in the last 100 years than being able to own their own car and drive
wherever and whenever they want.
 
For the greater good, you'll slowly be restricted and banned until your only
options will be walking, biking, and public transportation. If you want to
travel anywhere those things don't go, you'll have to apply to the government
for permission to use an EV, with such permits being rarely granted and
extremely expensive when they are. And don't even think about flying
anywhere.
Certainly not for anything as frivolous as a vacation.
 
This is the plan. It's indisputable that these are the goals. Every major
city, the U.S. government, and the United Nations have published versions of
them. It used to be called Agenda 21 until that became a pejorative after
enough people read it and realized what it meant, so they changed the name
and
repackaged it in shinier, happier verbiage. But at its heart, they want to
restrict the lives and the movements of the "average citizen" (note the
language that distinguishes between you and me and those who aren't
"average"-- i.e., elite celebrities and government officials; these
restrictions will not be for them, just for you).
 
They want to end the suburban lifestyle and individual home ownership for the
vast majority of society. Gavin Newsom has said as much. He has outright
stated that the "individual suburban homeowner model is unsustainable in
California and society must be reimagined and reformed accordingly".

 
What about the need to produce food? EVs aren't exactly a good option
for many farms and without farms there won't be food to keep those
voters alive.
 

So it's no surprise that California is well on its way with this plan,
passing
one bill after another every year that attacks the middle class homeowner
from
every side-- with the ultimate goal of having everyone living in tiny boxlike
apartments in massive hive-like high-rises like something out of a dystopian
movie like BLADE RUNNER, with everyone assigned a unit within walking
distance
of their jobs, preferably in the same building as their job, and never having
to (or being allowed to) travel beyond a mile radius for their whole lives.
 
Again, these are their stated goals. It's not a conspiracy theory. They're
not
even trying to hide it. Sure, it will take a long time to slowly boil this
frog-- they know they can't force it all at once or people will rebel, which
is why we get these little incremental steps with people only being asked to
give up a tiny bit of their freedom and liberty at a time-- "for the greater
good", of course-- but if you could live to a hundred years from now, you
wouldn't recognize the society they'll have created. All to "fight climate
change" and "save the earth".

 
Even if you are right it's not a real concern for me (or you or any of
us) as I'm not going to live long enough for it to be a concern.

Well, if that's the attitude, then why are we worried about "climate change"?
The same thing can be said about that. Even if it's true, it's not a concern
for us because we'll be long gone before any of the bad shit starts
happening.