Liste des Groupes | Revenir à rm misc |
On 9/24/2024 12:58 AM, BTR1701 wrote:moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:On 9/23/2024 1:29 PM, BTR1701 wrote:In article <vcs0oa$2okok$1@dont-email.me>, moviePig
<nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
On 9/22/2024 6:57 PM, BTR1701 wrote:In article <vcq6tu$2cmei$1@dont-email.me>, moviePig
<nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
On 9/22/2024 5:44 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
What can we conclude from this data?
Well, first and foremost, that the propagandists at the
L.A. Times are full of shit. They're literally lying to
promote an agenda.
September is a hot month in L.A. and has been going back
to the 1800s, long before SUVs, carbon footprints,
'climate change'. And notably, while there are some
record highs set post-2000, not one of them is in 2024,
which makes the Times' claim that our current heat wave
is 'record heat' or is 'breaking records' a complete
falsehood.
And these are the people who are supposedly
'fact-checking' everything from your social media posts
to your presidential candidates.
Who's fact-checking the fact-checkers?
The record lows occurred near or prior to the turn of last
century, while the record highs are generally later. Sounds
like warming to me.
What part of 'record-breaking' do you not understand?
I didn't read the claims, your or theirs.
Then you're not qualified to comment on this discussion. The only
thing you can do is try to change the subject, which is exactly
what you did.
"Not qualified"???
Yes, if you haven't read either my claims or the newspaper's, by
definition you don't what's being discussed here. In other words, not
qualified.
"Not qualified"??? Wow, congrats on your promotion to Gruppenführer!
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.