Re: restarting rec.photo.moderated

On Apr 27, 2025 at 9:59:36 AM MST, "%" wrote
<wH-dnRYuIabl_5P1nZ2dnZfqn_gAAAAA@giganews.com>:
 

Brock McNuggets wrote:

On Apr 27, 2025 at 8:33:06 AM MST, "%" wrote
<IqGcnbNYxLWr05P1nZ2dnZfqnPGdnZ2d@giganews.com>:
>

Brock McNuggets wrote:

On Apr 27, 2025 at 12:19:25 AM MST, "David" wrote
<m7643tFebcvU1@mid.individual.net>:
>

On 27/04/2025 07:20, Ivan Shmakov wrote:

       (I'm cross-posting this article to news:rec.photo.misc , as
       suggested in news:vs73t3$3hlga$2@dont-email.me , but setting
       Followup-To: news:rec.photo.digital as it seems to be about
       the only active newsgroup under rec.photo.)
>
       Back in January, the Big-8 Management Board have initiated [1]
       a discussion on the removal of moderated newsgroups that
       currently have no moderator, and are hence unusable.  One of
       such groups is rec.photo.moderated .  In March, I've volunteered
       (see References:) to take over its moderation.
>
       The group's creation RfD, including its charter, is at [2].
>
[1] Subject: 1st RfD: Mass-deletion of moderated groups without a moderator
        Followup-To: news.groups.proposals
        Date: Fri, 3 Jan 2025 20:33:02 EST
        Message-ID: <vla2t6$5g57$1@dont-email.me>
[2] http://ftp.isc.org/usenet/news.announce.newgroups/rec/rec.photo.moderated
>
       Like I've mentioned, I've never had much interest in moderated
       newsgroups before, much less been a moderator of one, so I can't
       promise smooth operation, especially right from the start.
>
       And regardless, I'd prefer not doing the thing entirely on my
       own; anyone here interested in taking part, perchance?
>
       My plan is to set up message submission email addresses aliased
       to my own mailbox, and approve (or not approve) them from there.
       Should there ever be any co-moderators, I'd move submissions to
       a password-protected portion of an https: website and provide
       an HTTP/1-based API (usable with curl(1) and compatible with
       Lynx, naturally) to approve the messages there.
>
       The group's charter [2] has the following bit:
>
     rpm> Postings must bear the submitter's real name and contain a valid
     rpm> reply address.
>
       I don't find the 'real name' requirement /enforceable/ (we
       don't have photo IDs on Usenet, after all.)  In its stead,
       I'm going to require a /consistent/ identity.  In particular,
       those who publish their photos under an alias are free to use
       that same alias for their r.p.m postings.
>
       Having a valid reply address (From: or Reply-To:) wouldn't
       be a strict requirement, either, but without the means of
       contacting the poster, I wouldn't be able to explain my
       reasons for rejecting their article.
>
       JFTR, I'm a lifelong personal computing amateur, but my
       interest in photography is relatively recent.  /Some/ of my
       photographs (among other media) can be found at [3].  As can
       be seen, my primary camera (body) is Pentax K-5.
>
       Thoughts?
>
[3] http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:ListFiles/Ivan_Shmakov

>
>
*Good luck with your group*, Ivan! 🙂
>
Cross-posted to my friends in ACW
>
Someone there may wish to help you.

>
I wonder how ACW would be different if it was moderated.
>

how about if we all lived on the same street

>
I prefer living in a house.
>

well you can build

 Why are they called buildings once they are built?