Re: Good glass

Liste des GroupesRevenir à rp digital 
Sujet : Re: Good glass
De : wibbleypants (at) *nospam* gmail.com (Paul Carmichael)
Groupes : rec.photo.digital
Date : 09. Jun 2025, 10:41:58
Autres entêtes
Message-ID : <pan$87969$f440eafe$199e227c$de9b6baf@gmail.com>
References : 1 2 3
User-Agent : Pan/0.147 (Sweet Solitude; 97d1711 github.com/GNOME/pan.git)
El Sun, 08 Jun 2025 13:32:32 -0500, Bill W escribió:

https://www.flickr.com/photos/wibbleypants/albums/72177720326695050/
 
Photo 1956 baffled me, so I had to google stuff. Now I know that the
farther the camera is from the focus point, the wider the DOF, so I’m
guessing that the camera was farther from the focus point in that photo
than the other two f1.8 photos.


The focus was the same in both - the green bit of the palm. It was me that
moved. The depth of field scale on the lens doesn't go bigger than f4. So
there should be no DoF at all.


--
Paul.

https://paulc.es
 

Date Sujet#  Auteur
6 Jun 25 * Good glass9Paul Carmichael
6 Jun 25 +* Re: Good glass3David Taylor
6 Jun 25 i`* Re: Good glass2Paul Carmichael
6 Jun 25 i `- Re: Good glass1David Taylor
8 Jun 25 `* Re: Good glass5Paul Carmichael
8 Jun 25  +- Re: Good glass1Paul Carmichael
8 Jun 25  `* Re: Good glass3Bill W
9 Jun 25   `* Re: Good glass2Paul Carmichael
11 Jun 25    `- Re: Good glass1Abandoned Trolley

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal