Re: Good glass

Liste des GroupesRevenir à rp digital 
Sujet : Re: Good glass
De : fred (at) *nospam* fred-smith.co.uk (Abandoned Trolley)
Groupes : rec.photo.digital
Date : 11. Jun 2025, 18:49:15
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <102cfiq$23v24$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 09/06/2025 10:41, Paul Carmichael wrote:
El Sun, 08 Jun 2025 13:32:32 -0500, Bill W escribió:
 
https://www.flickr.com/photos/wibbleypants/albums/72177720326695050/
>
Photo 1956 baffled me, so I had to google stuff. Now I know that the
farther the camera is from the focus point, the wider the DOF, so I’m
guessing that the camera was farther from the focus point in that photo
than the other two f1.8 photos.
  The focus was the same in both - the green bit of the palm. It was me that
moved. The depth of field scale on the lens doesn't go bigger than f4. So
there should be no DoF at all.
 
Theres some sort of square law at work here ?
I am told that if you focus on something, and then stop down the lens until the DoF extends half way to the camera, then the DoF in the other direction will extend to infinity.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
6 Jun 25 * Good glass9Paul Carmichael
6 Jun 25 +* Re: Good glass3David Taylor
6 Jun 25 i`* Re: Good glass2Paul Carmichael
6 Jun 25 i `- Re: Good glass1David Taylor
8 Jun 25 `* Re: Good glass5Paul Carmichael
8 Jun 25  +- Re: Good glass1Paul Carmichael
8 Jun 25  `* Re: Good glass3Bill W
9 Jun 25   `* Re: Good glass2Paul Carmichael
11 Jun 25    `- Re: Good glass1Abandoned Trolley

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal