Re: MathsBombe

Liste des GroupesRevenir à r puzzles 
Sujet : Re: MathsBombe
De : rjh (at) *nospam* cpax.org.uk (Richard Heathfield)
Groupes : rec.puzzles
Date : 09. Feb 2025, 11:13:31
Autres entêtes
Organisation : Fix this later
Message-ID : <vo9v4b$hlsf$3@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 09/02/2025 09:40, David Entwistle wrote:
On Sun, 19 Jan 2025 19:57:26 -0000 (UTC), David Entwistle wrote:
 
"MathsBombe is aimed at students up to Year 13 (England and Wales), S6
(Scotland), Year 14 (Northern Ireland). You don't need to be a computer
whizz or a mathematical genius — you just need to keep your wits about
you and be good at solving puzzles!"
>
Starts 16:00 GMT, 22nd January, 2025.
>
https://www.maths.manchester.ac.uk/mathsbombe/
 Please don't post a direct answer to the question posed, but I'd welcome a
bit of guidance on Mathsbombe question 3.
 When I look at the question, my reaction is "that doesn't look possible".
The "any positive integer cost can be paid" part of the question seems
problematic. Am I misreading, or misunderstanding the question?
I agree; it doesn't look possible. I was tempted to cut code, but I hit two ambiguities. What, precisely, does "no more than 14 coins of every given denomination" mean? It could mean an up-to-14-coin subset of the available range, or up to 14 totapennies PLUS up to 14 totatuppences PLUS up to 14 totathruppences and so on ad nauseam. And what does "any positive integer" mean? Does it, for example, include bloodybignumber? If so, how about bloodybignumber factorial?
I don't care enough, I'm afraid, but if I *did*, then having resolved those dilemmae, I would probably look at brute forcing a few thousand candidate x's (3.0000, 3.0001, 3.0002, 3.0003 etc) and then try to spot a pattern.
I would also look for tricks, eg i.
--
Richard Heathfield
Email: rjh at cpax dot org dot uk
"Usenet is a strange place" - dmr 29 July 1999
Sig line 4 vacant - apply within

Date Sujet#  Auteur
19 Jan 25 * MathsBombe23David Entwistle
9 Feb 25 `* Re: MathsBombe22David Entwistle
9 Feb 25  +* Re: MathsBombe6Richard Heathfield
9 Feb 25  i+* Re: MathsBombe4Mike Terry
9 Feb 25  ii`* Re: MathsBombe3Richard Heathfield
9 Feb 25  ii `* Re: MathsBombe2Mike Terry
10 Feb 25  ii  `- Re: MathsBombe1Richard Heathfield
11 Feb 25  i`- Re: MathsBombe1Richard Tobin
9 Feb 25  +- Re: MathsBombe1David Entwistle
10 Feb 25  `* Re: MathsBombe14Richard Tobin
10 Feb 25   +- Re: MathsBombe1Richard Heathfield
10 Feb 25   `* Re: MathsBombe - observations but not the answer12Richard Tobin
11 Feb 25    +* Re: MathsBombe - observations but not the answer4David Entwistle
11 Feb 25    i`* Re: MathsBombe - observations but not the answer3Richard Tobin
11 Feb 25    i `* Re: MathsBombe - observations but not the answer2David Entwistle
19 Feb 25    i  `- Re: MathsBombe - observations but not the answer1David Entwistle
20 Feb 25    `* Re: MathsBombe - observations but not the answer7David Entwistle
20 Feb 25     `* Re: MathsBombe - observations but not the answer6David Entwistle
20 Feb 25      +* Re: MathsBombe - observations but not the answer2Richard Tobin
20 Feb 25      i`- Re: MathsBombe - observations but not the answer1David Entwistle
20 Feb 25      `* Re: MathsBombe - observations but not the answer3Mike Terry
20 Feb 25       `* Re: MathsBombe - observations but not the answer2Richard Tobin
21 Feb 25        `- Re: MathsBombe - observations but not the answer1Mike Terry

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal