Sujet : Re: What is the smallest (positive) number, when spelled out, contains no repeated letters and contains each of
De : rjh (at) *nospam* cpax.org.uk (Richard Heathfield)
Groupes : rec.puzzlesDate : 05. Mar 2025, 13:01:21
Autres entêtes
Organisation : Fix this later
Message-ID : <vq9eeh$2b8tc$6@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 05/03/2025 11:44, Ammammata wrote:
HenHanna wrote on 05/03/2025 :
Thank you.. the original intended ans. was --------- Five Thousand.
shouldn't be "thousandS"?
"Five thousands" is perfectly good English, but so is "five thousand". One might prefer one over the other in a given context, but sans context either of them is fine.
-- Richard HeathfieldEmail: rjh at cpax dot org dot uk"Usenet is a strange place" - dmr 29 July 1999Sig line 4 vacant - apply within
Re: What is the smallest (positive) number, when spelled out, contains no repeated letters and contains each of
Re: What is the smallest (positive) number, when spelled out, contains no repeated letters and contains each of