Sujet : Re: Orange stacks
De : qnivq.ragjvfgyr (at) *nospam* ogvagrearg.pbz (David Entwistle)
Groupes : rec.puzzlesDate : 15. Jul 2025, 07:32:04
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <1054sl4$3u0lv$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4
User-Agent : Pan/0.149 (Bellevue; 4c157ba git@gitlab.gnome.org:GNOME/pan.git)
On Mon, 14 Jul 2025 11:54:06 -0000 (UTC), Richard Tobin wrote:
If I have this right, if I build my pyramids and glue the twelve
touching elements to the reference element, making two shapes, both of
thirteen elements each,
Yes.
then I finish up with two quite different shapes with quite different
symmetries.
But - hard though it may seem to believe - no!
I'm still struggling with the idea the structures of the square-based and
triangular-based pyramids are the same.
I think we can agree that there are 90 degree angles between the centres
of the cannonballs in the layers of the square based pyramid.
In my mind the triangular based pyramid is entirely regular and based on
the tetrahedral structure with a tetrahedral angle of (approximately)
109.5 degrees between all centres. There are no right angles.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tetrahedral_molecular_geometryIn my mind the square based and triangular based pyramids are not the same
packing structure.
-- David Entwistle