Re: We're considering banning Cujo

"Davey Zimmerman #274" <Chadweasel274@zoho.com> wrote in
news:XnsB2C6A96F76E5BReallyNotChad@135.181.20.170:

alexcainfan <live@wcw.com> wrote in
news:vtvh9g$2p1r0$1@paganini.bofh.team:
 

The "lol fake book cover" post spam is acknowledged as an issue and
most of the admins are against it. Chad Bryant is the issue. He's
ensconced this kook. He's now a made man.
 
The page admins are considering a ban. One was implemented before, but
it was retracted because we don't want to hinder legitimate criticism.

 
Ah, the sweet symphony of self-importance you perform on the keyboard!
 
You're like a peacock trying to woo a flock of pigeons with your flashy
plumage of half-truths and overcooked wit. Yet, your feathers are
ruffled by the slightest breeze of disagreement, revealing the scared
little chicken you truly are.
 
Your pathetic life is littered with the bones of your slain ego, and
each keystroke is a desperate squawk for the attention you crave. In

the

grand tapestry of wit and intellect, you're the unraveled thread that
everyone wishes would just disappear into the couch. So, by all means,
continue your online gladiator cosplay, but remember: even the most

epic

of battles are forgotten when all three of John's sheep move on to the
next viral John Henry begging video.
 
PS: Don't thrash, it attracts sharks by the fuckton.
 
 

Does the fact that you tricked the sad old women residing on that page
into thinking Monday was JH give you any pause?

Are you any better than JH himself at this point?