Sujet : Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1
De : 186283 (at) *nospam* ud0s4.net (186282@ud0s4.net)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.misc comp.os.linux.advocacyDate : 28. Dec 2024, 06:10:48
Autres entêtes
Organisation : wokiesux
Message-ID : <f6GcnYUuyu7qFfL6nZ2dnZfqnPidnZ2d@earthlink.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6
User-Agent : Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.13.0
On 12/27/24 7:34 AM, chrisv wrote:
Farley Flud wrote:
Charlie Gibbs wrote:
>
For many people, it's nothing more than a pissing match over the number
of features that their favourite software package offers. Whether they
actually use those features or not is irrelevant.
>
Meanwhile, those of us who just want to get the job done ignore all
that and look for a package that does what we want without all that
other stuff getting the way.
Indeed. I was tired of hearing about it decades ago. I've never once
had any need for either.
You're right ... 99% of people never NEED the 'new features'
in the latest releases. Just tend to THINK they do.
The Photoshop lackeys are always the instigators. They seem greatly
distressed by the fact that some folks do not worship their idol.
And, golly gee, the free product isn't as good as the expensive
product. What a "tragedy".
LibreOffice beats the crap out of anything M$ offers
these days. GIMP is basically as good as PhotoShop.