Re: Brideshead and paleo anthropology revisited

Liste des GroupesRevenir à sa paleo 
Sujet : Re: Brideshead and paleo anthropology revisited
De : mario.petrinovic1 (at) *nospam* zg.htnet.hr (Mario Petrinovic)
Groupes : sci.anthropology.paleo
Date : 11. Sep 2024, 07:59:54
Autres entêtes
Organisation : Iskon Internet d.d.
Message-ID : <vbrf5b$40q$1@sunce.iskon.hr>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 11.9.2024. 0:38, JTEM wrote:
  Mario Petrinovic wrote:
         No, I didn't use ignorance as an argument, I used logic as argument. Per logic, Atlantic Ocean is far wider than the Wallace Line.
 Which is ignorance, not logic. It's not "Logical" to "Argue" what
you think should be the case, ignoring what is the case.
I think that it should be the case that Atlantic Ocean is far wider than the Wallace line, but it actually isn't? Are you crazy? Are you narcissist?

         So, why they built the Lighthouse of Alexandria?
 So you also have no idea what a lighthouse is, what it's used for...
 
         Here you have a paper where they research Bay of Biscay in Bronze Age. I didn't read the whole paper (it has 828 pages, and it doesn't talk only about maritime trade), I only saw some tables. You can see on page 35 that sailors were going in paddled boats directly from Brittany to NW Iberia by sea crossing
 These tables that tell you this... are they in the room right now?
 Honey, look at a map. You just follow the coast.
Cherry pie, page 35, just a little read, direct route over open sea from Brittany to NW Iberia, 10 - 12 days, Bronze Age. They would go the same way back too, only if it isn't for unfavorable currents and winds.
"As a narcissist, you can't concede
the point and you can't admit that you're wrong so you had to convince
yourself that it was something else you were claiming..."

Date Sujet#  Auteur
6 Sep 24 * Brideshead and paleo anthropology revisited20JTEM
8 Sep 24 `* Re: Brideshead and paleo anthropology revisited19Mario Petrinovic
9 Sep 24  `* Re: Brideshead and paleo anthropology revisited18JTEM
9 Sep 24   `* Re: Brideshead and paleo anthropology revisited17Mario Petrinovic
9 Sep 24    `* Re: Brideshead and paleo anthropology revisited16JTEM
10 Sep 24     `* Re: Brideshead and paleo anthropology revisited15Mario Petrinovic
10 Sep 24      `* Re: Brideshead and paleo anthropology revisited14JTEM
10 Sep 24       `* Re: Brideshead and paleo anthropology revisited13Mario Petrinovic
10 Sep 24        `* Re: Brideshead and paleo anthropology revisited12JTEM
10 Sep 24         `* Re: Brideshead and paleo anthropology revisited11Mario Petrinovic
10 Sep 24          `* Re: Brideshead and paleo anthropology revisited10JTEM
11 Sep 24           `* Re: Brideshead and paleo anthropology revisited9Mario Petrinovic
12 Sep 24            `* Re: Brideshead and paleo anthropology revisited8JTEM
12 Sep 24             `* Re: Brideshead and paleo anthropology revisited7Mario Petrinovic
12 Sep 24              +* Re: Brideshead and paleo anthropology revisited3Mario Petrinovic
13 Sep 24              i`* Re: Brideshead and paleo anthropology revisited2JTEM
13 Sep 24              i `- Re: Brideshead and paleo anthropology revisited1Mario Petrinovic
13 Sep 24              `* Re: Brideshead and paleo anthropology revisited3JTEM
13 Sep 24               `* Re: Brideshead and paleo anthropology revisited2Mario Petrinovic
21 Sep 24                `- Re: Brideshead and paleo anthropology revisited1JTEM

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal