Sujet : Re: Reading 758-27 (archive)
De : mario.petrinovic1 (at) *nospam* zg.htnet.hr (Mario Petrinovic)
Groupes : sci.anthropology.paleoDate : 14. Dec 2024, 15:01:56
Autres entêtes
Organisation : Iskon Internet d.d.
Message-ID : <vjk34j$vc9$1@sunce.iskon.hr>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 14.12.2024. 5:34, JTEM wrote:
Mario Petrinovic wrote:
On 13.12.2024. 6:45, JTEM wrote:
Mario Petrinovic wrote:
We have blade technology 500 kya.
>
We had throwing spears 400,000 years ago. Blades
go back millions of years, if you want to get
technical.
>
The last that I heard is that blades started to occur 500 kya, and they became common 300 kya, if I recall correctly.
It's kind of funny how a chimp banging something with a rock
is "a tool" but early Homo (or even pre homo) BREAKING rocks
to produce sharp flakes for cutting isn't a "Blade."
They were sharp and used for cutting!
Put another way: How far back do CUT MARKS go?
Cut marks == blade
No?
I say yes, and your blades go back 3 million years plus, but
some evidence.
It looks like you are confusing something. Not every sharp edge is a blade. Blade tool is only a sickle, there is no other blade tool. Blades have sense only as a sickle.
A "Blade" is a "Tool" with a sharp edge used for cutting.
A knife is sickle, a and a sickle is knife. No, it isn't.