Re: Bone tools from 1.5 MYA

Liste des GroupesRevenir à sa paleo 
Sujet : Re: Bone tools from 1.5 MYA
De : mario.petrinovic1 (at) *nospam* zg.htnet.hr (Mario Petrinovic)
Groupes : sci.anthropology.paleo
Date : 06. Mar 2025, 19:59:35
Autres entêtes
Organisation : Iskon Internet d.d.
Message-ID : <vqcran$l3k$1@sunce.iskon.hr>
References : 1
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 6.3.2025. 17:40, erik simpson wrote:
Systematic bone tool production at 1.5 million years ago
 Ignacio de la Torre, Luc Doyon, Alfonso Benito-Calvo, Rafael Mora, Ipyana Mwakyoma, Jackson K. Njau, Renata F. Peters, Angeliki Theodoropoulou & Francesco d’Errico
 Abstract
Recent evidence indicates that the emergence of stone tool technology occurred before the appearance of the genus Homo1 and may potentially be traced back deep into the primate evolutionary line2. Conversely, osseous technologies are apparently exclusive of later hominins from approximately 2 million years ago (Ma)3,4, whereas the earliest systematic production of bone tools is currently restricted to European Acheulean sites 400–250 thousand years ago5,6. Here we document an assemblage of bone tools shaped by knapping found within a single stratigraphic horizon at Olduvai Gorge dated to 1.5 Ma. Large mammal limb bone fragments, mostly from hippopotamus and elephant, were shaped to produce various tools, including massive elongated implements. Before our discovery, bone artefact production in pre-Middle Stone Age African contexts was widely considered as episodic, expedient and unrepresentative of early Homo toolkits. However, our results demonstrate that at the transition between the Oldowan and the early Acheulean, East African hominins developed an original cultural innovation that entailed a transfer and adaptation of knapping skills from stone to bone. By producing technologically and morphologically standardized bone tools, early Acheulean toolmakers unravelled technological repertoires that were previously thought to have appeared routinely more than 1 million years later.
 https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-025-08652-5. Open access
So, did those who were persuading us into thinking that this was episodic, apologize? Or should we encounter misconceptions like this over and over again, just because this is "science", and science doesn't think.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
6 Mar 25 * Bone tools from 1.5 MYA8erik simpson
6 Mar 25 +* Re: Bone tools from 1.5 MYA5Mario Petrinovic
9 Mar 25 i`* Re: Bone tools from 1.5 MYA4Primum Sapienti
9 Mar 25 i +- Re: Bone tools from 1.5 MYA1JTEM
9 Mar 25 i `* Re: Bone tools from 1.5 MYA2Mario Petrinovic
9 Mar 25 i  `- Re: Bone tools from 1.5 MYA1JTEM
7 Mar 25 +- Re: Bone tools from 1.5 MYA1JTEM
9 Mar 25 `- Re: Bone tools from 1.5 MYA1Primum Sapienti

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal