Liste des Groupes | Revenir à sa paleo |
That's called an "Argument from ignorance."Yes but even if it's off by 100% that's still 40 million years shy ofStill it doesn't matter. There is a fossil record bias, a lot of animals we will never find. We do have the outcome, today's world, and we have to use logic to figure out how today's world emerged, not constrain our thinking solely on fossil record, although fossil record is extremely helpful.
your number... without a dugout canoe in sight.
I really don't see in which way Australia would be worse case than South America.>
Maybe it has something to do with the Wallace Line? You think that may
be why I brought it up? Hmm?
What is the "Wallace line" to you? A lot of animals never cross it. How is Wallace line worse than Atlantic Ocean? In your eyes Wallace line is wide all the way to Mars, while Atlantic Ocean is just a little pond. Hm.Typical narcissist...
And we don't have RADAR to warn us of the proximity of other ships, and
we lack radio and satellite communications to call for help, just like
in ancient times. That, or you're being a tit. Again.
You really don't know those things.A cat sprayed in your mouth, didn't it?
Yes, but: "Control of the tin trade seems to have been in Phoenician hands, and they kept their sources secret.". If the source was nearer, it wouldn't be a secret. Probably you can determine the source of unused tin, but what about tin which was smelted into bronze.Pulling you back to the conversation: The issue was never distance.
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.