Re: Ah, women drivers

On 14.10.2024. 8:15, Mario Petrinovic wrote:

On 14.10.2024. 6:51, Primum Sapienti wrote:

Mario Petrinovic wrote:

https://youtu.be/ERTrOwEb5M8?si=qGtZYPeWVEKssoFW
https://youtu.be/RZ_0ImDYrPY?si=pVzz6ZlOF3HbDZ8O

>
Golf carts don't have much in the way of
controls. Here's an older video of dogs
who were "taught" to drive
>
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BWAK0J8Uhzk
>
Almost creepy.

          Yes, stupid scientists deliberately take an animal, put it out if its context, and then they debate how animals are actually unable to do the task. It is obvious that those dogs don't know what are they doing there, and why. And they don't care, and they are not built at all to do the task. We all can see videos how cats slap dogs, and dogs cannot do anything about it. Because dogs cannot rotate their paws (this is why they cannot climb trees). So, those dogs are completely out of the context. This orangutan, on the other hand, fits very well, and all your stupid excuses don't hold water in my view. Here is a dog that is more into context, and his control is better than what I would do:
https://youtube.com/shorts/kvFKIovjbWo?si=_QfWsqq-_4fSor8F
         And here is an animal that walks bipedally better than humans would:
https://youtu.be/a0_nzhAC74g?si=bMcJs7_fDXLwp4-x
         So, all your fairy tales about humans almighty share with your pastor, and cut it out of science.

And if you, and all those scientists, would be any smart, they would realize that this ape shows that bipedality doesn't explain human adaptations in pelvis and the s-curve. My theory, on the other hand, perfectly explains those, but, of course, no stupid scientist care at all.