Re: Humans - "bipedal animals"?

Liste des GroupesRevenir à sa paleo 
Sujet : Re: Humans - "bipedal animals"?
De : gmkeros (at) *nospam* gmail.com (Kyonshi)
Groupes : sci.anthropology.paleo
Date : 26. Oct 2024, 23:53:56
Autres entêtes
Organisation : Erebor InterNetNews
Message-ID : <vfjru3$bpc$1@ereborbbs.duckdns.org>
References : 1
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 10/14/2024 8:50 AM, Mario Petrinovic wrote:
         Are we really that much more bipedal than other animals? No, we aren't. What distinguishes us from others is that we *cannot* be quadrupedal, this is our characteristic, we cannot be quadrupedal.
https://youtube.com/shorts/NLk9neGyheM?si=DzVuMfP8D7igswHB
         Did we become "bipedal" so that we can look over the grass? No, this doesn't make you "bipedal":
https://youtube.com/shorts/qiXw5_JD59g?si=97nQkAepJh3iac5S
kangaroos are also bipedal

Date Sujet#  Auteur
14 Oct 24 * Humans - "bipedal animals"?3Mario Petrinovic
26 Oct 24 `* Re: Humans - "bipedal animals"?2Kyonshi
27 Oct 24  `- Re: Humans - "bipedal animals"?1Mario Petrinovic

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal