Sujet : Re: Humans - "bipedal animals"?
De : mario.petrinovic1 (at) *nospam* zg.htnet.hr (Mario Petrinovic)
Groupes : sci.anthropology.paleoDate : 27. Oct 2024, 00:59:05
Autres entêtes
Organisation : Iskon Internet d.d.
Message-ID : <vfjvo9$9ba$1@sunce.iskon.hr>
References : 1 2
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 27.10.2024. 0:53, Kyonshi wrote:
On 10/14/2024 8:50 AM, Mario Petrinovic wrote:
Are we really that much more bipedal than other animals? No, we aren't. What distinguishes us from others is that we *cannot* be quadrupedal, this is our characteristic, we cannot be quadrupedal.
https://youtube.com/shorts/NLk9neGyheM?si=DzVuMfP8D7igswHB
Did we become "bipedal" so that we can look over the grass? No, this doesn't make you "bipedal":
https://youtube.com/shorts/qiXw5_JD59g?si=97nQkAepJh3iac5S
kangaroos are also bipedal
Yes. And they don't have different pelvis or the s-curve.
Humans - "bipedal animals"?
Re: Humans - "bipedal animals"?