Sujet : Re: Dragon Man
De : invalide (at) *nospam* invalid.invalid (Primum Sapienti)
Groupes : sci.anthropology.paleoDate : 09. Dec 2024, 04:21:41
Autres entêtes
Organisation : sum
Message-ID : <vj5no7$8eh9$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1
User-Agent : Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/91.0 SeaMonkey/2.53.18.2
erik simpson wrote:
“Dragon man” prompts rethinking of Middle Pleistocene hominin systematics in Asia
https://www.cell.com/the-innovation/fulltext/S2666-6758(23)00155-8?_returnURL=https%3A%2F%2Flinkinghub.elsevier.com%2Fretrieve%2Fpii%2FS2666675823001558%3Fshowall%3Dtrue It's the "lumpers" vs the "splitters" at work again. What it may really decribe is the "muddle in the middle". As with any science, the more you learn, the more compliated it gets.
"The growing Chibanian hominin fossil record
across Eurasia and Africa is raising a number
of interesting questions related to its
variability and how these different types are
related to each other."
Basically acknowledging a paucity of data...
Dragon Man
Re: Dragon Man