Re: The taxonomy of Sahelanthropus tchadensis from a craniometric perspective

On 8/6/24 12:14 PM, JTEM wrote:

John Harshman wrote:
 

Look at the thread, you cowardly twat. You were arguing AGAINST
me and I was pointing out that the so called evidence "against"
interbreeding was consistent with interbreeding, as per the
mainstream.

>
Nevertheless, it was Chris Ho-Stuart you were responding to in the post you just quoted.

 What I did with the quote was lay down in no uncertain terms what
I was saying in that THREAD.
 Science is consistent. You are not. You're actually pretending that
one quote was in isolation from everything else, even though it's a
lengthy thread.
 I love the quote. It demonstrates how you can uses pieces to assemble
the complete picture yet you instead try to use them to obscure the
picture. Like you're doing right now.

I have no idea what your argument is supposed to be here, but it appears to assume facts not in evidence. How about actually trying to make some kind of point explicitly and clearly? I mean some point other than "you're an idiot".
Let's try again. Here's your quote:
:  No, actually, it failed to address the question. That is the
:  inescapable fact that you have repeatedly managed to escape.
:  The "evidence" does not apply to the question. It is "evidence,"
:  yes, but not evidence for or against interbreeding. As Wilson
:  & Cann demonstrated (and the entire frigging scientific community
:  appears to have validated), the results of the testing are not
:  inconsistent with interbreeding. They are not. In fact, they
:  pretty much mirror the assumptions of the competing Out-Of
:  Africa/Replacement fans.
What is a complete citation for Wilson & Cann? What does it show, and how? How does it support your point, and what is your point?