Sujet : Re: namacalathus
De : rainbow (at) *nospam* colition.gov (Popping Mad)
Groupes : sci.bio.paleontologyDate : 01. Jan 2025, 07:55:37
Autres entêtes
Organisation : PANIX Public Access Internet and UNIX, NYC
Message-ID : <vl2otq$mdv$1@reader2.panix.com>
References : 1 2 3
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 12/31/24 8:22 PM, erik simpson wrote:
On 12/31/24 4:54 PM, John Harshman wrote:
On 12/31/24 3:38 PM, erik simpson wrote:
These are pictures of fossils stumbled upon by my son and me.
They're currently being examined by pros (Doug Erwin and Emma
Smith). We think they're Namacalathus. What do you think?
>
>
https://www.idrive.com/idrive/sh/sh?k=n8a8u1u6d0
>
It does rather resemble a series of cross-sections of Namacalathus.
Where was it found and do you know the age of the rock?
It's at 39.084523, -113.715651W. if that shows up in China, it's Google
maps' fautl. Just change the sign. The age is from a geologic map for
that part of Utah that doesn't have good resolution. I'me pretty
familiar with limestone from other locations, and the age is right at
the Ediacaran-Cambrian interface. It's the most easily accessible site
imaginable. You can drive to it.
url is broken
namacalathus
Re: namacalathus