Re: On the detection of the Wilkes Land impact crater

Liste des GroupesRevenir à sb paleontology 
Sujet : Re: On the detection of the Wilkes Land impact crater
De : john.harshman (at) *nospam* gmail.com (John Harshman)
Groupes : sci.bio.paleontology
Date : 14. Apr 2025, 01:35:47
Autres entêtes
Message-ID : <CfWdnV749uD-xWH6nZ2dnZfqlJydnZ2d@giganews.com>
References : 1
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 4/13/25 9:07 AM, erik simpson wrote:
https://earth-planets-space.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s40623-018-0904-7
 Abstract
 The definitive existence of a giant impact crater, two times larger than the Chixulub crater in the Yucatan peninsula, from an extraterrestrial origin, 1.6 km beneath Wilkes Land, East Antarctica, remain controversial. Here, we use the latest high-resolution gravito-topographic geopotential (SatGravRET 2014) model over Antarctica to offer a plausible confirmation of its existence. SatGravRET 2014 has a spatial resolution between 1 and 10 km at most places and included contemporary space gravimetry and gradiometry data from GRACE and GOCE, and other data including Bedmap 2 bedrock topography. We computed the gravity disturbances, the Marussi tensor of the second derivatives of the disturbing potential, the gravity invariants and their specific ratio, the strike angles and the virtual deformations to quantify the detailed geophysical features for the Wilkes Land anomaly. This set of the gravitational parameters revealed enhanced and more detailed geophysical features on the Wilkes Land Crater than previously possible only with the traditional gravity anomalies. Our findings support prior studies stating that in the Wilkes Land there is a huge impact crater/basin with detectable gravity mascon which is mostly consistent with the characteristics of an impact crater.
 The discussion includes the following: "These results widen space for geophysical interpretations and speculations. The huge impact had a planetary consequence, including for example the striking antipodal relationship of it to the Siberian Raps (claimed by von Frese et al. 2009).".
 If "Siberian Raps" really means Siberian Traps, the paleontological implications are obvious.
I'm supposing it would be very difficult to date this impact. Is the association with the Siberian traps solely their antipodal position? Would that have been true at the time of the traps?

Date Sujet#  Auteur
13 Apr 25 * On the detection of the Wilkes Land impact crater14erik simpson
14 Apr 25 +* Re: On the detection of the Wilkes Land impact crater3John Harshman
14 Apr 25 i`* Re: On the detection of the Wilkes Land impact crater2erik simpson
14 Apr 25 i `- Re: On the detection of the Wilkes Land impact crater1John Harshman
15 Apr 25 `* Re: On the detection of the Wilkes Land impact crater10x
15 Apr 25  `* Re: On the detection of the Wilkes Land impact crater9erik simpson
16 Apr 25   +* Re: On the detection of the Wilkes Land impact crater2Popping Mad
16 Apr 25   i`- Re: On the detection of the Wilkes Land impact crater1John Harshman
16 Apr 25   `* Re: On the detection of the Wilkes Land impact crater6Popping Mad
17 Apr 25    `* Re: On the detection of the Wilkes Land impact crater5Mikko
22 Apr 25     +* Re: On the detection of the Wilkes Land impact crater2Popping Mad
24 Apr 25     i`- Re: On the detection of the Wilkes Land impact crater1x
22 Apr 25     `* Re: On the detection of the Wilkes Land impact crater2x
23 Apr 25      `- Re: On the detection of the Wilkes Land impact crater1John Harshman

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal