Re: mail2usenet

On Tue, 18 Mar 2025 03:07:01 -0000 (UTC), Rich <rich@example.invalid>
wrote:

John <Man@the.keyboard> wrote:

On Mon, 17 Mar 2025 14:02:25 -0000 (UTC), S.A. <personne@null.domain>
wrote:
 

Nomen Nescio wrote:> In article <vr8i0b$194fa$1@paganini.bofh.team>

Gabx  <victor@domain.invalid> wrote:

>
https://m2usenet.virebent.art/
>

Hmmm..
The connection has timed out

>
c'est pas grave allez-y !!!

 
 Yeah, it timed-out for me, too, earlier today but I just tried it and
it seems to work. Message ID: <vrade2$1h1u1$1@paganini.bofh.team> was
from me.
 
 Sorry to use sci.crypt as a test group. :)

>
There are plenty of test groups for that.  alt.test being just one of
them.

 Yes, I do know this, but this discussion was ongoing in sci.crypt,
the test message was tiny and I wanted the result of the test to be
easily found by those already subscribing to *this* NG without them
needing to bother adding more complications to their lives.

 And your berating post was longer than my test post. As is this.

 I also thought that a couple of aspects of the email script were
interesting.

 I did also apologise for the pollution. Rather nicely.

 Y'know what, fuck it.

 This ain't no fun no more.

                                            J.