Sujet : Re: an scos2 test...
De : richard.nospam (at) *nospam* gmail.invalid (Richard Harnden)
Groupes : sci.cryptDate : 31. Jul 2024, 11:24:21
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <v8d3cl$1i007$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 31/07/2024 05:09, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
On 7/30/2024 9:08 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
On 7/27/2024 12:20 AM, Richard Harnden wrote:
On 27/07/2024 01:20, Ben Bacarisse wrote:
"Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> writes:
[...]
The key space is not that massive, so it can be brute forced for sure. However, its interesting wrt the plaintext. What if the plaintext is generated from a random source?
Afaict, if the plaintext is random, then its going to be hard to identify it as a legit plaintext?
If the plain text is random, then you'd never know if you got the correct decrypt anyway.
It only works for English (or C) text. It seems to work okay for French and "lorem ipsum". It doesn't like German.
It's doubtless slower cpu-timewise that brute forcing. It saves on eyeball-time.
an scos2 test...
Re: an scos2 test...