Sujet : Re: @ SCOS Message Format ?
De : rjh (at) *nospam* cpax.org.uk (Richard Heathfield)
Groupes : sci.cryptDate : 24. Feb 2025, 20:30:28
Autres entêtes
Organisation : Fix this later
Message-ID : <vpihcl$1diem$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 24/02/2025 18:08, Rich wrote:
Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> wrote:
>
Given this input:
>
[long input snipped]
$md5sum charset.txt
d5c6d06587dbac07fed831293ff0580d charset.txt
$ md5sum charset.scos2
87ea4967605a5ba4d69ff6cf0fb541f5 charset.scos2
>
Anyone get anything different?
Mouse copy/paste from Tin running inside a Urxvt terminal results in
identical md5's to yours above:
$ md5sum *
d5c6d06587dbac07fed831293ff0580d charset.txt
87ea4967605a5ba4d69ff6cf0fb541f5 charset.scos2
Thanks for that. So it is beginning to look like a fair lot of noise over not very much.
4F 72 20 77 65 20 63 6F 75 6C 64 20 6A 75 73 74
20 68 65 78 64 75 6D 70 20 74 65 78 74 20 69 6E
73 74 65 61 64 2E 20 3A 2D 29 0A
-- Richard HeathfieldEmail: rjh at cpax dot org dot uk"Usenet is a strange place" - dmr 29 July 1999Sig line 4 vacant - apply within
@ SCOS Message Format ?
Re: @ SCOS Message Format ?
