Sujet : Re: 43 18
De : rjh (at) *nospam* cpax.org.uk (Richard Heathfield)
Groupes : sci.cryptDate : 30. Mar 2025, 16:40:04
Autres entêtes
Organisation : Fix this later
Message-ID : <vsbokk$1p5rn$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 30/03/2025 15:22, Mini Mailer wrote:
Richard Heathfield wrote:
On 30/03/2025 10:23, Mini Mailer wrote:
7TIF7LwSWzkdecLlTj8wu84q3TTxA7D5/xcwH3HJZjkkLbMsTjUvwrM72TEF9LEHDT/P7I/WFdH=
>
They are different programs with different purposes, so there's not much
point in comparing them. For example, SCOS2 was designed to encrypt
*only* printable ASCII, a restriction that in the quest for
internationalisation your program completely overlooks... and that's
fine, because they are different programs with different purposes. Your
program also adds a layer of difficulty to ciphertext-only attacks,
whereas SCOS2 was designed to be easy to attack. And that too is fine;
they are different programs with different purposes.
>
Well, their purposes should be the same
Why?
-- Richard HeathfieldEmail: rjh at cpax dot org dot uk"Usenet is a strange place" - dmr 29 July 1999Sig line 4 vacant - apply within
43 18
Re: 43 18