Sujet : Re: The lost key
De : rjh (at) *nospam* cpax.org.uk (Richard Heathfield)
Groupes : sci.cryptDate : 31. Mar 2025, 23:10:41
Autres entêtes
Organisation : Fix this later
Message-ID : <vsf3t1$1cb0p$3@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 31/03/2025 22:17, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
On 3/31/2025 7:06 AM, Richard Heathfield wrote:
On 31/03/2025 14:16, Marcel Logen wrote:
Chris M. Thomasson in sci.crypt:
>
SCOS2 42 66
>
x9a|V.8 s0c C$jA #nI|9h P^kS 1 "i.4w V{t R>7iS; md |yfN~ ]{^XC* 9uI{!9
;(g N@3Y ~- tG( 0fD%rPg rb [9YL (oS= 6W H8pK's a: &f :paD #6mD^0b])n2
zzN@3 eE{ vW/t W/ j aL ^mc.6kC @y b'z qK+tL <9V. "hT-J :~%n8 umg' (l C^2
b> (iK( tTAM N\&o T-!WF9t H:G E:ykG~D ^V\
>
SCOS2 42 66
q 9g:$eR; tT<('
>
@(nZ] vl< <!g =0X\{v" G_p >_ a O@uX' "rI"nZq
>
Marcel :-)
>
It is of course the 100th such number, a fact of arguable importance but nonetheless a fact.
>
;^)
247 ; 2 + 4 + 7 ; ahh a prime? lol.
247 is not a prime.
$ factor 247
247: 13 19
You need a new perspective.
-- Richard HeathfieldEmail: rjh at cpax dot org dot uk"Usenet is a strange place" - dmr 29 July 1999Sig line 4 vacant - apply within
The lost key
Re: The lost key
