Sujet : Re: The lost key
De : chris.m.thomasson.1 (at) *nospam* gmail.com (Chris M. Thomasson)
Groupes : sci.cryptDate : 04. Apr 2025, 06:25:13
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vsnqfq$2kcea$4@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 4/1/2025 12:03 AM, Richard Heathfield wrote:
On 01/04/2025 07:58, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
On 3/31/2025 10:57 PM, Richard Heathfield wrote:
On 31/03/2025 23:43, Marcel Logen wrote:
Richard Heathfield in sci.crypt:
>
On 31/03/2025 22:17, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>
247 ; 2 + 4 + 7 ; ahh a prime? lol.
>
247 is not a prime.
>
2 + 4 + 7 = 13 :-)
>
Ah, I take it all back. :-)
>
So that gives us a whole new class of primes:
>
12, 14, 16, 20, 21, 25, 30, 32, 34...
>
(Let's hope it catches on, because it'll certainly make cracking RSA a damn sight easier.)
>
>
Ahhh:
>
https://oeis.org/search? q=12%2C+14%2C+16%2C+20%2C+21%2C+25%2C+30%2C+32%2C+34&language=english&go=Search
Truly is it said that there is nothing new under the sun.
Indeed. Sometimes there can be some truly unique things here on Earth, but then think of the grand scheme of things... Other "Suns", so to speak. Far out there... Fwiw, I am sorry about not having enough time to give your challenge a proper go. Shit. I am am just to busy.
I am not sure how to parse your digits. Damn!
The lost key
Re: The lost key
