Sujet : Re: FOSS and backdoors in the US
De : chris.m.thomasson.1 (at) *nospam* gmail.com (Chris M. Thomasson)
Groupes : sci.cryptDate : 10. May 2024, 02:08:44
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <v1js2u$vcvr$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 5/9/2024 3:15 PM, Rich wrote:
Chris M. Thomasson <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> wrote:
On 5/8/2024 9:27 PM, Marco Moock wrote:
Am 07.05.2024 18:20 Uhr schrieb Edward Teach:
>
Backdoors.
>
When people use PRIVATE ENCRYPTION BEFORE any messaging enters a
public channel.......
>
......backdoors are the least of their worries!
>
Isn't enough. There is a time when that message is unencrypted (e.g.
when entering it to the crypto application). The operating system can
then read the cleartext. If the backdoor is in the OS, X11 etc., it
still works here.
>
>
Go to a 100% "clean room", cloaked, cannot receive and/or send anything...
>
Encrypt a message on a clean thumb drive.
Where did you obtain the thumb drive?
Did you build it, from the ground up, or did you bring it into the
clean-room after purchase from a vendor?
If you purchased from a vendor, then how do you know said vendor did
not include a hardware backdoor on that thumb drive?
Take out the clean disk with a
single file on it. Destroy the computer...
How did the computer get into the clean room? How are you sure that no
hardware on the computer has a backdoor, or that no software running on
the computer has a backdoor?
Exit the clean room. This disk contains an encrypted file.
>
Is it safe?
The answer depends upon whether the thumbdrive and/or the computer used
in the clean room contained a hardware or software back door.
Hopefully, the thumbdrive is clean. If there even is such a thing...
;^o
FOSS and backdoors in the US
Re: FOSS and backdoors in the US
