Re: FOSS and backdoors in the US

Liste des GroupesRevenir à s crypt 
Sujet : Re: FOSS and backdoors in the US
De : rich (at) *nospam* example.invalid (Rich)
Groupes : sci.crypt
Date : 11. May 2024, 05:49:04
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <v1mtc0$1rosf$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
User-Agent : tin/2.6.1-20211226 ("Convalmore") (Linux/5.15.139 (x86_64))
Chris M. Thomasson <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> wrote:
 
So, is there a way to use a clean room, a clean computer and a clean
medium to store the encrypted file? Assuming clean means clean... ;^o

If you assume that "clean means clean" as to the computer hardware then
you don't necessarily need a "clean room" [1].  You just need the
hardware and software you are using at the time to be clean (as in free
of backdoors).

If they are free of backdoors at the time you are using them then your
actions on them disappear into history unrecorded (beyond whatever
outputs you intentionally made a record of).



[1] If you are being surveiled sufficient that some agency is
monitoring the RF emissions from your computer, at the same time you
encrypt whatever it is you are encrypting, with sufficient detail to
know what you are up to, then you likely have much bigger problems well
beyond whether Acme Corp installed a backdoor into your computer.

Plus keep in mind that "clean room" usually refers to particulate
contaminants, the phrase you likely are looking for is "Faraday cage".

Date Sujet#  Auteur
24 Apr 24 * FOSS and backdoors in the US32Marco Moock
24 Apr 24 +* Re: FOSS and backdoors in the US3Chris M. Thomasson
24 Apr 24 i+- Re: FOSS and backdoors in the US1Chris M. Thomasson
24 Apr 24 i`- Re: FOSS and backdoors in the US1Rich
27 Apr 24 +* Re: FOSS and backdoors in the US9Stefan Claas
28 Apr 24 i`* Re: FOSS and backdoors in the US8Rich
28 Apr 24 i `* Re: FOSS and backdoors in the US7Stefan Claas
28 Apr 24 i  +* Re: FOSS and backdoors in the US2Rich
30 Apr 24 i  i`- Re: FOSS and backdoors in the US1Phil Carmody
28 Apr 24 i  `* Re: FOSS and backdoors in the US4Chris M. Thomasson
29 Apr 24 i   `* Re: FOSS and backdoors in the US3Chris M. Thomasson
29 Apr 24 i    +- Re: FOSS and backdoors in the US1Chris M. Thomasson
29 Apr 24 i    `- Re: FOSS and backdoors in the US1Rich
7 May 24 `* Re: FOSS and backdoors in the US19Edward Teach
9 May 24  `* Re: FOSS and backdoors in the US18Marco Moock
9 May 24   `* Re: FOSS and backdoors in the US17Chris M. Thomasson
9 May 24    +* Re: FOSS and backdoors in the US2Stefan Claas
9 May 24    i`- Re: FOSS and backdoors in the US1Chris M. Thomasson
10 May 24    `* Re: FOSS and backdoors in the US14Rich
10 May 24     +* Re: FOSS and backdoors in the US3Chris M. Thomasson
10 May 24     i`* Re: FOSS and backdoors in the US2Stefan Claas
10 May 24     i `- Re: FOSS and backdoors in the US1Peter Fairbrother
10 May 24     +- Re: FOSS and backdoors in the US1Ian
10 May 24     `* Re: FOSS and backdoors in the US9Chris M. Thomasson
10 May 24      +* Re: FOSS and backdoors in the US5Rich
11 May 24      i`* Re: FOSS and backdoors in the US4Chris M. Thomasson
11 May 24      i `* Re: FOSS and backdoors in the US3Rich
11 May 24      i  `* Re: FOSS and backdoors in the US2Chris M. Thomasson
11 May 24      i   `- Re: FOSS and backdoors in the US1Chris M. Thomasson
5 Jun 24      `* Re: FOSS and backdoors in the US3Edward Teach
5 Jun 24       +- Re: FOSS and backdoors in the US1Peter Fairbrother
17 Jun 24       `- Re: FOSS and backdoors in the US1Chris M. Thomasson

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal