Sujet : Re: Speaking of long-ish passwords
De : chris.m.thomasson.1 (at) *nospam* gmail.com (Chris M. Thomasson)
Groupes : sci.cryptDate : 21. Jun 2024, 03:16:00
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <v52np1$2uvck$2@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 6/20/2024 7:06 PM, Cri-Cri wrote:
On Thu, 20 Jun 2024 16:02:03 -0000 (UTC), Rich wrote:
And key source can also be obsfucated somewhat, in that one could
combine the numbers in a pattern (zig-zag, circular, etc., i.e.,
anything other than left to right top to bottom).
Yes, it could be built upon indefinitely. I suppose even being used as a
code in itself. For example, grouping numbers for page-row-word numbers in
some book. If only a few words are in need of being encrypted, like
"DELIVERY FRIDAY", 81 digits might be enough.
And, who's to know that we aren't writing in code now? ;)
http://fractallife247.com/test/hmac_cipher/ver_0_0_0_1?ct_hmac_cipher=4719759cad9265f6f38ec25a7fbec19144df819e9f049d87a016c43a86c864c66366e5162872b616a579549433dbcb93fa5d17601e6f8e9c6eb9c34ff0884362a13437d0d0714f18f8ff2ab75a37a4ee
Re: Speaking of long-ish passwords
Re: Speaking of long-ish passwords