Sujet : Re: Seriation
De : rich (at) *nospam* example.invalid (Rich)
Groupes : sci.cryptDate : 08. Dec 2024, 17:05:56
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vj4g54$3sqat$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5
User-Agent : tin/2.6.1-20211226 ("Convalmore") (Linux/5.15.139 (x86_64))
Stefan Claas <
pollux@tilde.club> wrote:
Rich wrote:
And why would you think it would not also eventually be "cracked" and
"floating around on bitmessage" after some time?
I do not think that, I only propose something else to use.
Ok, fair enough. But does it add anything of value over SCOS? SCOS's
'value' was in the practice of analysis and working out the algorithm
given just the encrypted messages (plus an 'oracle' who would encrypt
requested messages).
The actual 'obsfucation' factor was secondary.
Seriation
Re: Seriation