Sujet : Re: Seriation
De : rjh (at) *nospam* cpax.org.uk (Richard Heathfield)
Groupes : sci.cryptDate : 01. Feb 2025, 12:03:12
Autres entêtes
Organisation : Fix this later
Message-ID : <vnkv1g$1vk4$2@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 08/12/2024 17:10, Stefan Claas wrote:
Rich wrote:
Stefan Claas <pollux@tilde.club> wrote:
Rich wrote:
>
And why would you think it would not also eventually be "cracked" and
"floating around on bitmessage" after some time?
>
I do not think that, I only propose something else to use.
>
Ok, fair enough. But does it add anything of value over SCOS? SCOS's
'value' was in the practice of analysis and working out the algorithm
given just the encrypted messages (plus an 'oracle' who would encrypt
requested messages).
>
The actual 'obsfucation' factor was secondary.
To make it short, SCOS is dead and I liked to propose something
new for the community, so that we have more traffic here.
scos2 31 41
x=i# rB b(N5m cFt# g)f3 :Q(VF2
-- Richard HeathfieldEmail: rjh at cpax dot org dot uk"Usenet is a strange place" - dmr 29 July 1999Sig line 4 vacant - apply within
Seriation
Re: Seriation