Re: xorpng

On a sunny day (Mon, 10 Feb 2025 00:59:04 +0000) it happened Richard
Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> wrote in <vobj0o$t1cd$1@dont-email.me>:

On 05/01/2025 06:17, Rich wrote:

Stefan Claas <pollux@tilde.club> wrote:

Rich wrote:
>

If instead you mean some kind of "special, PNG aware, encryptor that
only encrypted the bitmap data of a PNG", but left the file as
otherwise a proper PNG image structure, then that is slightly tricky
(and an algorithm that is only useful for PNG's alone).

>
Yes, this is what I mean.

 
Which brings up the question of: why?
 
Why go to the trouble to create an encryptor that is specalized for
just encrypting the internal bitmap data within a PNG, leaving the rest
as a PNG file, when a generic "byte stream" encryptor will encrypt the
entire PNG with no extra effort?

>
Sorry to come late to the party.
>
I can think of two places where image formats can be useful in
cryptography.
>
Firstly, lossless image formats can be used to steganographically
hide small ciphertexts in the low bits without seriously
degrading the image.
>
Secondly, if you want an eyeball on how tangled your bits are,
rip off the image's metadata, encrypt the bitmap data, bolt the
metadata back on, and visually inspect the resulting image and
look for patterns (or, if you used Tux - of course you did - any
remnants of penguin).

Reading this I got a weird idea:
what if of you use the 'Alien problem' (discussed here long ago)
and use picture hight and picture width as the ratio for a simple ASCII message?
Leave the picture unaltered, use resize...
Have not tried it though.