Re: @ SCOS Message Format ?

Liste des GroupesRevenir à s crypt 
Sujet : Re: @ SCOS Message Format ?
De : rjh (at) *nospam* cpax.org.uk (Richard Heathfield)
Groupes : sci.crypt
Date : 24. Feb 2025, 12:18:35
Autres entêtes
Organisation : Fix this later
Message-ID : <vphkib$11sgo$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 24/02/2025 10:45, Richard Harnden wrote:
On 24/02/2025 10:28, Richard Heathfield wrote:
On 24/02/2025 10:17, Richard Harnden wrote:
On 24/02/2025 09:51, David Entwistle wrote:
On Sun, 23 Feb 2025 10:55:41 +0000, Richard Heathfield wrote:
>
I did. I found no articles under your name in the current feed for that
group.
I have found nothing of the kind in that group.
>
>
Oh dear. Stephan found them. Perhaps your reader. ;)
>
they should start at:
>
Subject: Character Test
Message-ID: <vpeakb$cgsc$1@dont-email.me>
>
I think you said uk.telecom.  That is uk.test :)
>
That would certainly explain it. Test groups tend to be huge. Let David post here if he wants us to read his examples.
>
 That one isn't.
Okay. Found them.

 Anyway, in my thunderbird: x^2 superscripts, x ^ 2 does not.
In mine, neither do.
x^2 (x hat 2) is perfectly valid C code, so superscripting it wrongly changes its meaning.
Given this input:
32   ^  ^ *
33 ! ^! ^!*
34 " ^" ^"*
35 # ^# ^#*
36 $ ^$ ^$*
37 % ^% ^%*
38 & ^& ^&*
39 ' ^' ^'*
40 ( ^( ^(*
41 ) ^) ^)*
42 * ^* ^**
43 + ^+ ^+*
44 , ^, ^,*
45 - ^- ^-*
46 . ^. ^.*
47 / ^/ ^/*
48 0 ^0 ^0*
49 1 ^1 ^1*
50 2 ^2 ^2*
51 3 ^3 ^3*
52 4 ^4 ^4*
53 5 ^5 ^5*
54 6 ^6 ^6*
55 7 ^7 ^7*
56 8 ^8 ^8*
57 9 ^9 ^9*
58 : ^: ^:*
59 ; ^; ^;*
60 < ^< ^<*
61 = ^= ^=*
62 > ^> ^>*
63 ? ^? ^?*
64 @ ^@ ^@*
65 A ^A ^A*
66 B ^B ^B*
67 C ^C ^C*
68 D ^D ^D*
69 E ^E ^E*
70 F ^F ^F*
71 G ^G ^G*
72 H ^H ^H*
73 I ^I ^I*
74 J ^J ^J*
75 K ^K ^K*
76 L ^L ^L*
77 M ^M ^M*
78 N ^N ^N*
79 O ^O ^O*
80 P ^P ^P*
81 Q ^Q ^Q*
82 R ^R ^R*
83 S ^S ^S*
84 T ^T ^T*
85 U ^U ^U*
86 V ^V ^V*
87 W ^W ^W*
88 X ^X ^X*
89 Y ^Y ^Y*
90 Z ^Z ^Z*
91 [ ^[ ^[*
92 \ ^\ ^\*
93 ] ^] ^]*
94 ^ ^^ ^^*
95 _ ^_ ^_*
96 ` ^` ^`*
97 a ^a ^a*
98 b ^b ^b*
99 c ^c ^c*
100 d ^d ^d*
101 e ^e ^e*
102 f ^f ^f*
103 g ^g ^g*
104 h ^h ^h*
105 i ^i ^i*
106 j ^j ^j*
107 k ^k ^k*
108 l ^l ^l*
109 m ^m ^m*
110 n ^n ^n*
111 o ^o ^o*
112 p ^p ^p*
113 q ^q ^q*
114 r ^r ^r*
115 s ^s ^s*
116 t ^t ^t*
117 u ^u ^u*
118 v ^v ^v*
119 w ^w ^w*
120 x ^x ^x*
121 y ^y ^y*
122 z ^z ^z*
123 { ^{ ^{*
124 | ^| ^|*
125 } ^} ^}*
126 ~ ^~ ^~*
scos2 e 98 76 gives this output:
8q   l  U F
*z p cH .^3
ZJ | ]6 sYM
{8 % jf B<!
gS H /^ zgT
@( 6 qY I;(
nb R |} 6qa
,] ' xv PN}
va a G/ %zh
E[ [ 4r WJ;
2j g N\ -5o
L? . "1 dT<
9s 8 Ua #/v
SC A )7 kZE
*1 % bf ?<2
ZL U [# rtL
{! l iD A!9
gU > :2 yUS
;9 u pM H_*
oT E \" 5dZ
<) 3 wV O~{
vc N F- $mg
E# $ 3e V,@
2l W M' _vn
L> + !n cF,
9u f T< ]4u
SE L () jkD
*3 8 aa //1
aD Y }; qxK
}2 6 hY |;8
hM d ;> x2R
;" [ or GJ&
oV e <, 43Y
<- \ v5 NX=
ve x EP "=f
E' H 2^ Ug'
2n 6 LY );m
L< Q 9{ bp>
!m & Sh [|t
T, Z *: iyC
(v } Zq :I0
aF i {A p7J
}4 / gz \R7
hO r @J w*Q
;% B n8 Fa^
oX 0 ,S 3[X
<= K u( Mj+
vg 9 Db !?e
F+ T 1] Ts~
3f ) Kk (Cl
M@ c 8. a1.
!o # Rt }Ls
T\ l &D h!B
(x > Y2 ;Uz
aH u =M o_I
}6 E f" <d6
hQ 3 'V v~P
;& N m- Em%
pP $ >e 2,W
\^ + tn LF-
wY s CK 9(d
F{ ' 0v SN#
3h a J/ *zk
M: ' 7v ZN?
!q ` h` Q`B
)z B Y8 ;az
bJ 0 =S o[I
[8 K f( <j6
aI: s $K e(\
7pZ ] Es "Kf
|=7 T l] Ds$
gOA 1 )T k]E
%vi . K1 (Tl
F~* c r. J1)
mUJ ! }c q.K
_1r D Q! {cr
L?[ l xD P!}
saS _ @l wDQ
[8q M W_ 'lx
RA} u 3M V_@
yhR ~ >u 2MW
;^z V c~ .u3
XG/ 3 9V b~>
4na , B3 8Vc
,-8 e i, A39
dMB $ &e h,B
!tj F H$ ^ei
C]( n oF G$&
jTA + +n nFH
*0i O N+ -no
I/* w uO M++
pZJ M #_ tlN
=6r ! Tc ].u
O\[ # 0t SL#
vfS X /@ zwT
$md5sum charset.txt
d5c6d06587dbac07fed831293ff0580d  charset.txt
$ md5sum charset.scos2
87ea4967605a5ba4d69ff6cf0fb541f5  charset.scos2
Anyone get anything different?
--
Richard Heathfield
Email: rjh at cpax dot org dot uk
"Usenet is a strange place" - dmr 29 July 1999
Sig line 4 vacant - apply within

Date Sujet#  Auteur
9 Feb 25 * @ SCOS Message Format ?34Byrl Raze Buckbriar
9 Feb 25 +- Re: @ SCOS Message Format ?1Onion Courier
10 Feb 25 `* Re: @ SCOS Message Format ?32Richard Heathfield
10 Feb 25  `* Re: @ SCOS Message Format ?31Rich
10 Feb 25   `* Re: @ SCOS Message Format ?30Richard Heathfield
21 Feb 25    `* Re: @ SCOS Message Format ?29David Entwistle
21 Feb 25     `* Re: @ SCOS Message Format ?28Richard Heathfield
21 Feb 25      `* Re: @ SCOS Message Format ?27David Entwistle
22 Feb 25       `* Re: @ SCOS Message Format ?26Richard Heathfield
22 Feb 25        `* Re: @ SCOS Message Format ?25David Entwistle
22 Feb 25         `* Re: @ SCOS Message Format ?24Richard Heathfield
23 Feb 25          `* Re: @ SCOS Message Format ?23David Entwistle
23 Feb 25           `* Re: @ SCOS Message Format ?22Richard Heathfield
24 Feb 25            `* Re: @ SCOS Message Format ?21David Entwistle
24 Feb 25             +* Re: @ SCOS Message Format ?18Richard Harnden
24 Feb 25             i+* Re: @ SCOS Message Format ?16Richard Heathfield
24 Feb 25             ii+* Re: @ SCOS Message Format ?13Richard Harnden
24 Feb 25             iii`* Re: @ SCOS Message Format ?12Richard Heathfield
24 Feb 25             iii +* Re: @ SCOS Message Format ?3Richard Harnden
24 Feb 25             iii i+- Re: @ SCOS Message Format ?1Richard Heathfield
24 Feb 25             iii i`- Re: @ SCOS Message Format ?1Rich
24 Feb 25             iii `* Re: @ SCOS Message Format ?8Rich
24 Feb 25             iii  `* Re: @ SCOS Message Format ?7Richard Heathfield
24 Feb 25             iii   `* Re: @ SCOS Message Format ?6Rich
25 Feb 25             iii    `* Re: @ SCOS Message Format ?5Richard Heathfield
25 Feb 25             iii     +- Re: @ SCOS Message Format ?1Richard Harnden
25 Feb 25             iii     `* Re: @ SCOS Message Format ?3Rich
25 Feb 25             iii      `* Re: @ SCOS Message Format ?2Richard Heathfield
25 Feb 25             iii       `- Re: @ SCOS Message Format ?1Rich
24 Feb 25             ii`* Re: @ SCOS Message Format ?2David Entwistle
24 Feb 25             ii `- Re: @ SCOS Message Format ?1Richard Heathfield
24 Feb 25             i`- Re: @ SCOS Message Format ?1David Entwistle
24 Feb 25             +- Re: @ SCOS Message Format ?1Richard Heathfield
24 Feb 25             `- Re: @ SCOS Message Format ?1Jan Panteltje

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal