Re: mail2usenet

On 18/03/2025 09:31, John wrote:

On Tue, 18 Mar 2025 03:07:01 -0000 (UTC), Rich <rich@example.invalid>
wrote:
 

John <Man@the.keyboard> wrote:

On Mon, 17 Mar 2025 14:02:25 -0000 (UTC), S.A. <personne@null.domain>
wrote:
>

Nomen Nescio wrote:> In article <vr8i0b$194fa$1@paganini.bofh.team>

Gabx  <victor@domain.invalid> wrote:

>
https://m2usenet.virebent.art/
>

Hmmm..
The connection has timed out

>
c'est pas grave allez-y !!!

>
  Yeah, it timed-out for me, too, earlier today but I just tried it and
it seems to work. Message ID: <vrade2$1h1u1$1@paganini.bofh.team> was
from me.
>
  Sorry to use sci.crypt as a test group. :)

>
There are plenty of test groups for that.  alt.test being just one of
them.

   Yes, I do know this, but this discussion was ongoing in sci.crypt,

Not so's anyone would notice.

the test message was tiny and I wanted the result of the test to be
easily found by those already subscribing to *this* NG without them
needing to bother adding more complications to their lives.
   And your berating post was longer than my test post. As is this.

Feel free to grow up any time soon. Like the man said, there are plenty of test groups.

  I also thought that a couple of aspects of the email script were
interesting.

But apparently unrelated to cryptography, or presumably by now you'd have drawn our attention to the connection.

   I did also apologise for the pollution. Rather nicely.
   Y'know what, fuck it.
   This ain't no fun no more.

Wait till you grow up. When eventually you "get" it about respecting boundaries, you'd be amazed at how much fun remains to be had that /doesn't/ involve shitting on the neighbours' lawns and laughing "oops sorry" in their faces.
--
Richard Heathfield
Email: rjh at cpax dot org dot uk
"Usenet is a strange place" - dmr 29 July 1999
Sig line 4 vacant - apply within