Sujet : Re: The lost key
De : chris.m.thomasson.1 (at) *nospam* gmail.com (Chris M. Thomasson)
Groupes : sci.cryptDate : 06. Apr 2025, 21:20:07
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vsunlo$1rj05$2@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 4/6/2025 1:14 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
On 4/6/2025 3:41 AM, Marcel Logen wrote:
Richard Heathfield in sci.crypt:
>
On 06/04/2025 02:26, Marcel Logen wrote:
>
49184 87069 85461 51598 38286 31222 99049 92521 48220 18433
[...]
>
38811 65216 66401 68566 71607 88766 30093 20785 13788 66768
[...]
53109 21508 67876 04651 44198 09199 66939 09980 53449 11974
77016 06674 253
>
OK
>
(Quite a practical little cipher as it turns out.)
>
ACK
>
The five-groups remind me of the "number stations" from the
Cold Ware era.
Shit. I was not paying attention to the five groups. For some reason 3+8+8+1+1 = 21, is that mapping to an alphabet?
65216 = 20
66401 = 17
I just don't know. Argh! I need to get back to fractal work now. Damn. The only time I have to work on it is late at night when I am dead tired. Ugggg. Sorry Richard. ;^o
I have no idea if that is it. But it seems like fun:
54236 = 20
would map to the same position in an alphabet as:
65216 = 20
Oh well.
The lost key
Re: The lost key
