Sujet : Re: Blowfish reliability
De : rich (at) *nospam* example.invalid (Rich)
Groupes : sci.cryptDate : 15. Jul 2025, 23:07:48
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <1056jfk$ag12$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1
User-Agent : tin/2.6.1-20211226 ("Convalmore") (Linux/5.15.139 (x86_64))
Anonymous <
nobody@yamn.paranoici.org> wrote:
Is this blog post significant?
<https://hatchjs.com/cryptographydeprecationwarning-blowfish-has-been-deprecated/>
The major significance is this sentence fragment from the first
paragraph:
"and should not be used for new applications."
Don't start a new project and pick Blowfish as the cipher.
Blowfish reliability
Re: Blowfish reliability
