Re: Valve frequency multipliers

Liste des GroupesRevenir à se design 
Sujet : Re: Valve frequency multipliers
De : liz (at) *nospam* poppyrecords.invalid.invalid (Liz Tuddenham)
Groupes : sci.electronics.design
Date : 02. Feb 2025, 22:10:28
Autres entêtes
Organisation : Poppy Records
Message-ID : <1r75b73.axbbfdyzzjjuN%liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid>
References : 1 2 3 4
User-Agent : MacSOUP/2.4.6
Tauno Voipio <tauno.voipio@notused.fi.invalid> wrote:

On 1.2.2025 17.30, Liz Tuddenham wrote:
legg <legg@nospam.magma.ca> wrote:
 
[...]
>
I'd be more selective of the crystal frequency. Two triplers might get
you there with a lot less grief.
 
I regret to say I think you are right   :-(
 
Quintuplers just don't seem to work in those circuits so I have placed
an order for a 16.656 Mc/s crystal, which will triple-triple to 149.904
Mc/s.  That will mean bringing the VFO down to a range of 3.904 to 5.904
Mc/s, which should be relatively easy.
 
Revised block diagram at:
http://www.poppyrecords.co.uk/other/Transceiver/BlockDiag6a.gif
 
It will make image rejection in the second receiving mixer a little more
difficult  The transmitting mixer is intended to be balanced, so
rejecting 149.904 Mc/s instead of 150.000 Mc/s from the output will not
be any more difficult but I may require an extra tuned circuit in the
later part of the transmitting chain to reduce the level of image
frequency.
 
I just hope the new crystal will work in the same circuit as the old one
and I won't have all the hassle of redesigning it.
 
 
 
Liz: You should not attempt to transmit anything around 150 MHz. It is
on a frequency band reserved for satellite communication, and any
unlicensed transmission is strongly frowned at.

I am being very careful to avoid transmitting any spurious signals at
150 Mc/s; the U.K. Amateur Radio band is 144 - 146 Mc/s and I  am only
allowed to transmit within that band. 

The block diagram (referred to above) shows that the 150 Mc/s output of
the multiplier chain is mixed with the output of a variable frequency
oscillator to give a signal in the 144 - 146 Mc/s band.  A balanced
mixer should attenuate the 150 Mc/s signal and further filtering removes
any remaining residual 150 Mc/s and the image freqency (164 - 166 Mc/s).

In an earlier design I proposed a low-side input to the mixer at 135
Mc/s but abandoned this when I realise that the image would be 124 - 126
Mc/s:.  This is in the band allocated to aircraft and I live undeneath
the flight path to Bristol Airport.


--
~ Liz Tuddenham ~
(Remove the ".invalid"s and add ".co.uk" to reply)
www.poppyrecords.co.uk

Date Sujet#  Auteur
31 Jan 25 * Valve frequency multipliers52Liz Tuddenham
31 Jan 25 +* Re: Valve frequency multipliers3john larkin
31 Jan 25 i+- Re: Valve frequency multipliers1Liz Tuddenham
1 Feb 25 i`- Re: Valve frequency multipliers1Cursitor Doom
1 Feb 25 +* Re: Valve frequency multipliers29Cursitor Doom
1 Feb 25 i`* Re: Valve frequency multipliers28john larkin
1 Feb 25 i +* Re: Valve frequency multipliers3Cursitor Doom
1 Feb 25 i i`* Re: Valve frequency multipliers2john larkin
1 Feb 25 i i `- Re: Valve frequency multipliers1Cursitor Doom
1 Feb 25 i `* Re: Valve frequency multipliers24Liz Tuddenham
1 Feb 25 i  +* Re: Valve frequency multipliers2Martin Brown
1 Feb 25 i  i`- Re: Valve frequency multipliers1Liz Tuddenham
1 Feb 25 i  +* Re: Valve frequency multipliers2legg
1 Feb 25 i  i`- Re: Valve frequency multipliers1Liz Tuddenham
1 Feb 25 i  `* Re: Valve frequency multipliers19john larkin
1 Feb 25 i   +* Re: Valve frequency multipliers12Liz Tuddenham
1 Feb 25 i   i+- Re: Valve frequency multipliers1john larkin
1 Feb 25 i   i`* Re: Valve frequency multipliers10Martin Brown
1 Feb 25 i   i `* Re: Valve frequency multipliers9john larkin
1 Feb 25 i   i  `* Re: Valve frequency multipliers8Liz Tuddenham
2 Feb 25 i   i   `* Re: Valve frequency multipliers7john larkin
2 Feb 25 i   i    `* Re: Valve frequency multipliers6Liz Tuddenham
2 Feb 25 i   i     `* Re: Valve frequency multipliers5Cursitor Doom
2 Feb 25 i   i      `* Re: Valve frequency multipliers4Phil Hobbs
2 Feb 25 i   i       +- Re: Valve frequency multipliers1Cursitor Doom
3 Feb 25 i   i       `* Re: Valve frequency multipliers2John S
4 Feb 25 i   i        `- Re: Valve frequency multipliers1john larkin
4 Feb 25 i   `* Re: Valve frequency multipliers6legg
4 Feb 25 i    +* Re: Valve frequency multipliers3john larkin
4 Feb 25 i    i`* Re: Valve frequency multipliers2Phil Hobbs
5 Feb 25 i    i `- Re: Valve frequency multipliers1john larkin
4 Feb 25 i    `* Re: Valve frequency multipliers2Tauno Voipio
5 Feb 25 i     `- Re: Valve frequency multipliers1legg
1 Feb 25 `* Re: Valve frequency multipliers19legg
1 Feb 25  +* Re: Valve frequency multipliers13Liz Tuddenham
2 Feb 25  i+* Re: Valve frequency multipliers5Tauno Voipio
2 Feb 25  ii`* Re: Valve frequency multipliers4Liz Tuddenham
3 Feb 25  ii `* Re: Valve frequency multipliers3Tauno Voipio
3 Feb 25  ii  `* Re: Valve frequency multipliers2Liz Tuddenham
3 Feb 25  ii   `- Re: Valve frequency multipliers1Tauno Voipio
4 Feb 25  i`* Re: Valve frequency multipliers7legg
4 Feb 25  i +- Re: Valve frequency multipliers1john larkin
4 Feb 25  i `* Re: Valve frequency multipliers5Liz Tuddenham
5 Feb 25  i  `* Re: Valve frequency multipliers4john larkin
5 Feb 25  i   `* Re: Valve frequency multipliers3John S
5 Feb 25  i    `* Re: Valve frequency multipliers2Liz Tuddenham
5 Feb 25  i     `- Re: Valve frequency multipliers1john larkin
9 Feb 25  `* Re: Valve frequency multipliers5Liz Tuddenham
9 Feb 25   +* Re: Valve frequency multipliers2Tauno Voipio
9 Feb 25   i`- Re: Valve frequency multipliers1Liz Tuddenham
10 Feb 25   `* Re: Valve frequency multipliers2legg
10 Feb 25    `- Re: Valve frequency multipliers1Liz Tuddenham

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal