Re: what is wrong with RF people?

Liste des GroupesRevenir à se design 
Sujet : Re: what is wrong with RF people?
De : jl (at) *nospam* glen--canyon.com (john larkin)
Groupes : sci.electronics.design
Date : 30. Oct 2024, 00:17:58
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <23r2ijpfaevgvkjpimisajni3mqdma9703@4ax.com>
References : 1 2
User-Agent : ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
On Tue, 29 Oct 2024 18:56:34 -0400 (EDT), Martin Rid
<martin_riddle@verison.net> wrote:

john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> Wrote in message:r
https://www.digikey.com/en/products/detail/macom-technology-solutions/MASW-007107-TR3000/4429770Apparently "DC" means 2 GHz to these people. They test it with 8 pFseries caps on the input and output.I once used a Maxim part rated DC to 10 GHz, that absolutely screwedup below 100 MHz.A lot of "DC" parts are actually characterized down to 9 KHz, becauselots of spectrum analyzers only go that low.Grrrrr.
>
O yes,  they are different. No one would really understand,  until
you work with one.
>
Cheers

I found one Pericom RF switch that is "True DC to 8 GHz", which may be
an improvement.

So DC means AC, but "True DC" means DC in the RF world.




Date Sujet#  Auteur
29 Oct 24 * what is wrong with RF people?5john larkin
29 Oct 24 `* Re: what is wrong with RF people?4Martin Rid
30 Oct 24  `* Re: what is wrong with RF people?3john larkin
31 Oct 24   `* Re: what is wrong with RF people?2Cursitor Doom
11 Nov 24    `- Re: what is wrong with RF people?1John S

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal