Re: Fuzz boxes

Liste des GroupesRevenir à se design 
Sujet : Re: Fuzz boxes
De : user (at) *nospam* example.net (bitrex)
Groupes : sci.electronics.design
Date : 24. Feb 2025, 02:19:42
Autres entêtes
Message-ID : <67bbc88a$5$2759$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
References : 1 2
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 2/23/2025 7:04 PM, john larkin wrote:
On Sun, 23 Feb 2025 23:30:41 +0000, TTman <kraken.sankey@gmail.com>
wrote:
 
Can anyone explain why the best ones seem to use germanium transtors, (
and 'matched pairs' at that)? Why not a simple op amp with back to back
diodes? Any circuits?
 I designed the signal path for the Ryder amps.
 https://www.thegearpage.net/board/index.php?threads/ryder-amps-cabs-from-the60s.663614/
 They were named for a co-worker, Frank Ryder, who was also a small
plane aerobatic instructor. The only time I ever got close to motion
sick was after an hour flying with him.
 The Ryder amp had a path that used a tracking diode clipper followed
by a diferentiator. They called it "bell tone", not fuzz. It had a
"long sustain", whatever that means.
As a long-time guitarist my impression is that guitarists tend to be a pretty conservative bunch, and often the reason for something being considered "the best" tends to be because that's the way the classic pedals were and those were the products that the great names of history used.
Certain signal paths and devices are sacred, like communion wafers.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
24 Feb 25 * Fuzz boxes7TTman
24 Feb 25 +* Re: Fuzz boxes4john larkin
24 Feb 25 i+* Re: Fuzz boxes2bitrex
26 Feb 25 ii`- Re: Fuzz boxes1Lasse Langwadt
24 Feb 25 i`- Re: Fuzz boxes1Joe Gwinn
24 Feb 25 `* Re: Fuzz boxes2Jeff Liebermann
24 Feb 25  `- Re: Fuzz boxes1Jeff Liebermann

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal