Sujet : Re: Cooling a TO-220 7812 regulator
De : jl (at) *nospam* 650pot.com (john larkin)
Groupes : sci.electronics.designDate : 16. Sep 2024, 19:10:56
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <8vsgej9j96i96di7k065q0avop21i28o77@4ax.com>
References : 1 2
User-Agent : ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
On Mon, 16 Sep 2024 17:46:29 -0000 (UTC), piglet
<
erichpwagner@hotmail.com> wrote:
Pimpom <Pimpom@invalid.invalid> wrote:
I'm going to use a standard 7812 TO-220 regulator on a single-sided 1 oz
board with the dissipation varying as below:
- Idle at 120-150mW
- 0.5W for 1-5 minutes at irregular intervals
- Up to 4W for 1 second at the start of each 0.5W phase
The interval between the 1-5-minute periods is variable and may be 1 to
10 minutes.
The ground pin is soldered to ~2 sq.in. of copper on the PCB.
Options:
1) As described. No extra heatsinking.
2) Mount it on a small Al heatsink.
3) Place the regulator horizontally on the underside and bolt it to the
copper.
Tamb = ~35ºC max
Do you think option 1) is enough? Or should I go for 2) or 3)?
>
You mentioned single sided board so I would be wary of just having the
regulator standing straight up anchored only by the legs. Without plated
through holes a s/s board joint cannot reliably support the weight of a
TO220 package if the unit is dropped or shaken. My preference would be to
screw it down to board if only for mechanical reasons-then the bolt
hardware and area of copper underneath provide a little bit of extra
heat-sinking it also gives more allowance against someone installing the
unit next to a furnace or somewhere hotter than 35degC
I think he has a 10:1 or so thermal safety margin. Most fets are rated
for 150 or 175 degC max Tj, and can stand a lot more in real life.
I agree about the standup vibration issue. Why not use a surface-mount
dpak?