Sujet : Re: Serial, concurrent, parallel
De : nospam (at) *nospam* b-howie.co.uk (brian)
Groupes : sci.electronics.designDate : 16. Jan 2025, 16:10:37
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <GmidCLItFSinFw1R@b-howie.co.uk>
References : 1
User-Agent : Turnpike/6.07-S (<LeVO5MkOML+CNqa47kjhriw$C6>)
In message <
vm69a2$2h52d$1@dont-email.me>, Don Y <
blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> writes
I am surprised (disturbed?) at the problems people seem to have
sorting these things out in their thought processes. I don't
*believe* people think strictly "serially" but I am beginning to
question that belief as I witness smart/capable people stuck in
that mindset!
It's simple project engineering and resource management . PERT , Critical path analysis, lead times , Gantt charts, even Microsoft Project if you must. You must be talking to non-engineers.
Brian
-- Brian Howie
Date | Sujet | # | | Auteur |
14 Jan 25 | Serial, concurrent, parallel | 35 | | Don Y |
14 Jan 25 |  Re: Serial, concurrent, parallel | 9 | | Liz Tuddenham |
14 Jan 25 |   Re: Serial, concurrent, parallel | 8 | | Don Y |
14 Jan 25 |    Re: Serial, concurrent, parallel | 7 | | Liz Tuddenham |
15 Jan 25 |     Re: Serial, concurrent, parallel | 6 | | Don Y |
16 Jan 25 |      Re: Serial, concurrent, parallel | 5 | | Liz Tuddenham |
16 Jan 25 |       Re: Serial, concurrent, parallel | 4 | | Don Y |
16 Jan 25 |        Re: Serial, concurrent, parallel | 3 | | Liz Tuddenham |
16 Jan 25 |         Re: Serial, concurrent, parallel | 1 | | Don Y |
16 Jan 25 |         Re: Serial, concurrent, parallel | 1 | | ehsjr |
16 Jan 25 |  Re: Serial, concurrent, parallel | 20 | | Martin Brown |
16 Jan 25 |   Re: Serial, concurrent, parallel | 19 | | Don Y |
16 Jan 25 |    Re: Serial, concurrent, parallel | 16 | | Liz Tuddenham |
16 Jan 25 |     Re: Serial, concurrent, parallel | 13 | | Don Y |
16 Jan 25 |      Re: Serial, concurrent, parallel | 12 | | Liz Tuddenham |
16 Jan 25 |       Re: Serial, concurrent, parallel | 5 | | Don Y |
17 Jan 25 |        Re: Serial, concurrent, parallel | 4 | | Liz Tuddenham |
17 Jan 25 |         Re: Serial, concurrent, parallel | 3 | | Don Y |
17 Jan 25 |          Re: Serial, concurrent, parallel | 1 | | Don Y |
17 Jan 25 |          Re: Serial, concurrent, parallel | 1 | | Don Y |
16 Jan 25 |       Re: Serial, concurrent, parallel | 6 | | Edward Rawde |
17 Jan 25 |        Re: Serial, concurrent, parallel | 5 | | Don Y |
17 Jan 25 |         Re: Serial, concurrent, parallel | 4 | | Edward Rawde |
17 Jan 25 |          Re: Serial, concurrent, parallel | 3 | | Don Y |
17 Jan 25 |           Re: Serial, concurrent, parallel | 2 | | Edward Rawde |
17 Jan 25 |            Re: Serial, concurrent, parallel | 1 | | Don Y |
16 Jan 25 |     Re: Serial, concurrent, parallel | 2 | | Martin Brown |
16 Jan 25 |      Re: Serial, concurrent, parallel | 1 | | Don Y |
16 Jan 25 |    Re: Serial, concurrent, parallel | 2 | | Martin Brown |
16 Jan 25 |     Re: Serial, concurrent, parallel | 1 | | Don Y |
16 Jan 25 |  Re: Serial, concurrent, parallel | 5 | | brian |
16 Jan 25 |   Re: Serial, concurrent, parallel | 3 | | john larkin |
17 Jan 25 |    Re: Serial, concurrent, parallel | 2 | | brian |
17 Jan 25 |     Re: Serial, concurrent, parallel | 1 | | john larkin |
16 Jan 25 |   Re: Serial, concurrent, parallel | 1 | | Don Y |