Re: An actual circuit

Liste des GroupesRevenir à se design 
Sujet : Re: An actual circuit
De : spamme (at) *nospam* not.com (Mike Monett VE3BTI)
Groupes : sci.electronics.design
Date : 25. May 2024, 02:59:38
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <XnsB17CDFBC01F77idtokenpost@135.181.20.170>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
User-Agent : Xnews/2009.05.01
Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> wrote:

Insect cruelty. Plus you have to count their tiny feets backwards.
 
The only good bugs is dead bugs. ;)
 
Cheers
 
Phil Hobbs

The major flaw with dead bugs is you lose the identification of the ic.

Six months later, you will have no idea what the circuit is, where the
important signals are, or how the circuit works.

Many high frequency ic's have a ground tab that must be connected to
ground. This is not possible with dead bugs.

Often not all of a prototype must be on a copperclad ground plane.
Perpheral supporting circuits can be placed on a prototype board, with a
section of ground plane mounted on the proto board as needed. This makes
mounting test points and input and output signals much easier.

Amazon has a large selection of suitable proto boards:

https://www.amazon.ca/s?k=prototype+pcb+board


--
MRM

Date Sujet#  Auteur
23 May 24 * An actual circuit32Edward Rawde
23 May 24 `* Re: An actual circuit31john larkin
24 May 24  `* Re: An actual circuit30john larkin
24 May 24   `* Re: An actual circuit29Edward Rawde
24 May 24    +* Re: An actual circuit6john larkin
24 May 24    i+* Re: An actual circuit3bitrex
24 May 24    ii`* Re: An actual circuit2bitrex
24 May 24    ii `- Re: An actual circuit1Edward Rawde
25 May 24    i`* Re: An actual circuit2Edward Rawde
25 May 24    i `- Re: An actual circuit1john larkin
24 May 24    `* Re: An actual circuit22Jeroen Belleman
24 May 24     +- Re: An actual circuit1john larkin
24 May 24     `* Re: An actual circuit20Edward Rawde
24 May 24      `* Re: An actual circuit19john larkin
24 May 24       `* Re: An actual circuit18Edward Rawde
24 May 24        `* Re: An actual circuit17john larkin
25 May 24         `* Re: An actual circuit16Phil Hobbs
25 May 24          `* Re: An actual circuit15Edward Rawde
25 May 24           `* Re: An actual circuit14Phil Hobbs
25 May 24            +- Re: An actual circuit1Edward Rawde
25 May 24            `* Re: An actual circuit12john larkin
25 May 24             `* Re: An actual circuit11Phil Hobbs
25 May 24              `* Re: An actual circuit10Mike Monett VE3BTI
25 May 24               +- Re: An actual circuit1john larkin
25 May 24               +* Re: An actual circuit4john larkin
25 May 24               i`* Re: An actual circuit3Edward Rawde
25 May 24               i `* Re: An actual circuit2john larkin
25 May 24               i  `- Re: An actual circuit1Edward Rawde
25 May 24               `* Re: An actual circuit4Phil Hobbs
25 May 24                `* Re: An actual circuit3john larkin
25 May 24                 `* Re: An actual circuit2Phil Hobbs
25 May 24                  `- Re: An actual circuit1john larkin

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal