Sujet : Re: OT: about peer review
De : jlarkin_highland_tech (at) *nospam* nirgendwo (john larkin)
Groupes : sci.electronics.designDate : 13. Jul 2024, 14:30:22
Autres entêtes
Message-ID : <d8059jtu535m2gquqlpfn1jc0h3pa6sukf@4ax.com>
References : 1
User-Agent : ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
On Sat, 13 Jul 2024 05:00:47 GMT, Jan Panteltje <
alien@comet.invalid>
wrote:
Peer review is essential for science. Unfortunately, itâs broken.
https://arstechnica.com/science/2024/07/peer-review-is-essential-for-science-unfortunately-its-broken/
There's no incentive to fix the system, which was never designed to catch fraud anyway.
..
yea..
Lots of repeats in science of things that are obviously wrong.
Next generation maybe...
Every now and then someone writes a totally nonsense paper, basically
a parody, and gets it reviewed and published. AI take the work out of
even that.