Re: yes!

On Sat, 17 Aug 2024 06:26:27 GMT, Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid>
wrote:

On a sunny day (Fri, 16 Aug 2024 15:07:52 -0700) it happened john larkin
<jlarkin_highland_tech> wrote in <06jvbjp36khao0m5ot65a1o1krricoasre@4ax.com>:
>

It's just code.

>
Not any more it isn't.

>
Those giant computer networks don't run code?
>

Your lack of understanding is a handicap.

>
Your lack of imagination ditto.

>
Well, there is a bit of your lack of understanding

So you understand how brains work?

Where are images stored, and how can one recognize and name one of
maybe a million storted images in a fraction of a second?

You know about analog computing
So big neural networks are basically imitations of the analog brain.
But you can do a lot in hardware such as storing the 'weights' and vector multiplication. communication.
My suggestion is for you, just as a free time project, code some neural net.
Or at least look up how it works:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neural_network
>
No need for digital at all.
https://research.ibm.com/projects/analog-ai
 
OTOH my opinion is that our brain stores memory in RNA and DNA, strong hint is that
newborn species of many types know how the move, find food, interpret what they see and feel, etc.
Recent research found that in those neurons some data is stored in such a basic form as RNA,
>
Nature .. we still invent thing nature alread had millions of years ago.
>

I've been in several situations where people wanted to use NN's. It
never actually worked. It doesn't make sense.