Re: oscillator gain

Liste des GroupesRevenir à se design 
Sujet : Re: oscillator gain
De : JL (at) *nospam* gct.com (john larkin)
Groupes : sci.electronics.design
Date : 20. Oct 2024, 19:51:38
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <k3kahjhj4alm07lgrv2koib7ts7r6a2p7m@4ax.com>
References : 1 2 3 4
User-Agent : ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
On Sun, 20 Oct 2024 08:23:56 -0700, john larkin <JL@gct.com> wrote:

On Sun, 20 Oct 2024 09:06:24 +0100, liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid
(Liz Tuddenham) wrote:
>
Cursitor Doom <cd999666@notformail.com> wrote:
>
On Sat, 19 Oct 2024 07:05:08 -0700, john larkin wrote:
 
If the loop gain of an oscillator is slightly over 1.00, oscillations
gain amplitude. Just under 1.00, they die out.
 
Economies are like that.
 
https://www.breitbart.com/europe/2024/10/19/record-633000-business-in-
britain-on-brink-of-collapse-report/
 
And the Communists have only been in government for around 2 months. It
doesn't take long for them to wreck everything!
>
It usually takes a generation to really wreck things, although it has
been done a lot faster.
>
>
Could Breitbart be biassed in some way ?
>
Most news sources are horribly biased, essentially propaganda.
>
Real Clear at least links to both sides.
>
The New York Times seems to be getting a little bit more journalistic
lately. I hope that trend continues.
>
>
>

Not today! The NYT is all Trump Trash everywhere today. They couldn't
publish a blueberry muffin recipe without insulting Trump.

But they don't talk about Harris much.


Date Sujet#  Auteur
19 Oct 24 * oscillator gain40john larkin
19 Oct 24 +* Re: oscillator gain9Jan Panteltje
19 Oct 24 i`* Re: oscillator gain8john larkin
19 Oct 24 i `* Re: oscillator gain7Jan Panteltje
19 Oct 24 i  `* Re: oscillator gain6john larkin
20 Oct 24 i   `* Re: oscillator gain5Jan Panteltje
20 Oct 24 i    `* Re: oscillator gain4Cursitor Doom
20 Oct 24 i     `* Re: oscillator gain3john larkin
20 Oct 24 i      `* Re: oscillator gain2Cursitor Doom
21 Oct 24 i       `- Re: oscillator gain1john larkin
19 Oct 24 +* Re: oscillator gain25Cursitor Doom
20 Oct 24 i+- Re: oscillator gain1john larkin
20 Oct 24 i+- Re: oscillator gain1Bill Sloman
20 Oct 24 i+* Re: oscillator gain10Jan Panteltje
20 Oct 24 ii`* Re: oscillator gain9john larkin
20 Oct 24 ii +* Re: oscillator gain3Cursitor Doom
21 Oct 24 ii i`* Re: oscillator gain2john larkin
21 Oct 24 ii i `- Re: oscillator gain1Bill Sloman
21 Oct 24 ii +* Re: oscillator gain4Edward Rawde
21 Oct 24 ii i`* Re: oscillator gain3john larkin
21 Oct 24 ii i `* Re: oscillator gain2Bill Sloman
21 Oct 24 ii i  `- Re: oscillator gain1Liz Tuddenham
21 Oct 24 ii `- Re: oscillator gain1Bill Sloman
20 Oct 24 i`* Re: oscillator gain12Liz Tuddenham
20 Oct 24 i +* Re: oscillator gain3Cursitor Doom
20 Oct 24 i i+- Re: oscillator gain1Bill Sloman
20 Oct 24 i i`- Re: oscillator gain1john larkin
20 Oct 24 i `* Re: oscillator gain8john larkin
20 Oct 24 i  +* Re: oscillator gain3Joe Gwinn
20 Oct 24 i  i`* Re: oscillator gain2Cursitor Doom
21 Oct 24 i  i `- Re: oscillator gain1Bill Sloman
20 Oct 24 i  `* Re: oscillator gain4john larkin
20 Oct 24 i   +* Re: oscillator gain2Cursitor Doom
21 Oct 24 i   i`- Re: oscillator gain1Bill Sloman
21 Oct 24 i   `- Re: oscillator gain1Bill Sloman
20 Oct 24 +- Re: oscillator gain1Bill Sloman
20 Oct 24 `* Re: oscillator gain4Cursitor Doom
21 Oct 24  +- Re: oscillator gain1Bill Sloman
21 Oct 24  `* Re: oscillator gain2john larkin
22 Oct 24   `- Re: oscillator gain1Bill Sloman

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal